Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center-back sitting at 54.65 on the FQ scale — a typical performer range that reflects adequate but unremarkable contribution across 28 matches (2,436 minutes) this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what is absent: all role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, creation) are null, meaning the score is built on limited dimensional signal. What data does exist — 1.29 tackles per 90 and a 7.21 average rating — paints a picture of a functional but unspectacular defensive presence.
The FQ score of 54.65 sits in the typical-performer band primarily because no sub-score clears the 70 threshold required to lift the overall rating, and the null defensive sub-score — the most critical dimension for a center-back — means the model cannot reward elite defensive output even if it exists. The consensus across all three specialist agents converged on a 50s-range score with 0.73 confidence, reflecting genuine mid-range performance rather than a data artefact.
Form score (54.47) and FQ score (54.65) are separated by just -0.18 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no sign of either improvement or decline.
Both sit in the 54-56 FQ range for the center-back role, reflecting similar overall output levels; Konaté's score of 55.09 edges slightly higher, suggesting marginally more consistent contribution across measured dimensions.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Romero's FQ score of 53.00 places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close overall match; however, Romero's profile is associated with a more aggressive, duel-heavy defensive style that contrasts with the flatter per-90 numbers seen here.
Blind's 56.30 FQ score is the closest ceiling in this comparable set, and both profiles share a lack of standout sub-score peaks; Blind's positional versatility historically adds contextual value that a pure center-back profile does not carry.
The defense sub-score is null — the single most important dimension for a center-back — meaning tackles, aerial duels, interceptions, and clearances could not be fully quantified. The available proxy of 1.29 tackles per 90 is functional but does not signal an above-baseline defensive presence.
0.11 goals and 0.15 assists per 90, with 0.26 key passes per 90, are below what would be expected from a ball-playing center-back who contributes to build-up. For a Premier League starter, these numbers offer minimal offensive upside.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →