Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center back sitting at 53 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — across 23 matches and 1,876 minutes this season. The most notable data point is a per-90 tackle rate of 2.78, which provides some signal of defensive engagement, but all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning a full positional assessment is not possible. At 53, this player is not meeting the baseline expected of a consistent Premier League starter at center back.
The FQ score of 53 is driven primarily by below-baseline overall output with no sub-score dimension clearing the 70 threshold. The absence of a defense sub-score — the single most important dimension for a center back — means the score leans heavily on aggregate signal rather than role-specific defensive production, which limits precision but does not inflate the rating.
Form score of 53.99 sits just 1 point above the FQ score of 53 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no evidence of either a breakout or a decline phase.
Konaté's FQ score of 55.09 places him just above this player in the same typical-performer band; both operate as Premier League center backs with limited sub-score granularity, though Konaté's marginally higher score suggests slightly more consistent aggregate output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Diks scores 50.48, sitting just below this player, reflecting a similar profile of adequate but below-baseline production; the key difference is positional — Diks operates in a wider defensive role, making direct defensive-output comparisons imprecise.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score is the closest floor comparison, reflecting a similarly thin contribution profile; this player edges ahead marginally in overall score, though neither separates from the typical-performer tier.
All role-critical sub-scores — defense, physical duel, progression — are null despite 91% data completeness. For a center back, the absence of duel win rates, aerial success, and interception data means the 2.78 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive signal, leaving core positional quality unassessed.
0.19 goals per 90 and 0.05 assists per 90 are low even by center back standards, and 0.62 key passes per 90 offers limited creation output. For a CB in the Premier League, these numbers do not suggest a meaningful ball-playing or set-piece threat role.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →