Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 50.48 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — whose most notable on-ball output is a modest 0.32 key passes per 90 and 0.16 goals per 90, figures that are peripheral contributions for this role. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not what stands out positively, but what is absent: all sub-scores (defense, progression, possession control, physical duel) are null, leaving the core of a center back's job unquantified. At 27 matches and 2,267 minutes this season, the sample is substantial enough that the data gaps reflect a measurement limitation, not a thin evidence problem.
The FQ score of 50.48 is driven primarily by the absence of any positive sub-score signal — no defense, physical duel, or progression score exists to push the rating above the typical-performer floor. The per-90 tackle rate of 1.71 is the only defensive indicator available, and without context on duels won, interceptions, or aerial dominance, the system cannot credit core center back contributions.
Form score of 52.44 sits 1.96 points above the FQ score of 50.48 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful directional trend. The specialist panel flagged a modest improving signal, but the delta is too narrow to constitute a genuine upward trajectory.
Nearly identical FQ score (50.11 vs 50.48), placing both in the typical performer tier for center backs; Dźwigała's profile may offer more sub-score granularity, which would be the key differentiator in a side-by-side evaluation.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable overall rating (50.04) in the same adequacy band, though Kolašinac's career profile as a more physically aggressive defender likely produces a different sub-score shape if data were available.
Closest FQ score (49.62) of the three comparables, sitting just below this player; both profiles occupy the same typical-performer ceiling, with Alderete's South American background potentially reflecting a different defensive style within a similar output band.
The defenseScore is null despite 2,267 minutes played at center back — the single most critical dimension for this role. Tackles at 1.71 per 90 are the only defensive signal available, and without interception, duel, or aerial data, the player's primary job cannot be properly evaluated.
0.16 goals per 90 and 0.32 key passes per 90 are below what would be expected even from a ball-playing center back in the Bundesliga. These figures are not a concern in isolation for a pure defensive CB, but they offer no compensating value to offset the missing defensive picture.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →