TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Kevin Diks

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Borussia Mönchengladbach
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Oct 6, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#4
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Kevin Diks
Kevin Diks
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Borussia Mönchengladbach
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Oct 6, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#4
TactiQ Score
71.3
92% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
71.3
Form Score
68.8
Confidence
92%
Role
center_back
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.15
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.30
Tackles
1.67
Rating
6.91
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 50.48 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — whose most notable on-ball output is a modest 0.32 key passes per 90 and 0.16 goals per 90, figures that are peripheral contributions for this role. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not what stands out positively, but what is absent: all sub-scores (defense, progression, possession control, physical duel) are null, leaving the core of a center back's job unquantified. At 27 matches and 2,267 minutes this season, the sample is substantial enough that the data gaps reflect a measurement limitation, not a thin evidence problem.

Why this score

The FQ score of 50.48 is driven primarily by the absence of any positive sub-score signal — no defense, physical duel, or progression score exists to push the rating above the typical-performer floor. The per-90 tackle rate of 1.71 is the only defensive indicator available, and without context on duels won, interceptions, or aerial dominance, the system cannot credit core center back contributions.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 52.44 sits 1.96 points above the FQ score of 50.48 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful directional trend. The specialist panel flagged a modest improving signal, but the delta is too narrow to constitute a genuine upward trajectory.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Adam Dźwigała

Nearly identical FQ score (50.11 vs 50.48), placing both in the typical performer tier for center backs; Dźwigała's profile may offer more sub-score granularity, which would be the key differentiator in a side-by-side evaluation.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2377
Goals
4
Key passes
8
Rating
6.91
Tackles
44
Shots on target
12
Successful dribbles
11
Clean sheets
11
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 69.6Form 70.0
Previous
TQ 64.2Form 66.6
Current
TQ 68.3Form 68.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.15
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.30
Tackles
1.67
Rating
6.91
Sead Kolašinac

Comparable overall rating (50.04) in the same adequacy band, though Kolašinac's career profile as a more physically aggressive defender likely produces a different sub-score shape if data were available.

Compare →
Omar Federico Alderete Fernández

Closest FQ score (49.62) of the three comparables, sitting just below this player; both profiles occupy the same typical-performer ceiling, with Alderete's South American background potentially reflecting a different defensive style within a similar output band.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2377 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
44 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
11 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive sub-score visibility

The defenseScore is null despite 2,267 minutes played at center back — the single most critical dimension for this role. Tackles at 1.71 per 90 are the only defensive signal available, and without interception, duel, or aerial data, the player's primary job cannot be properly evaluated.

Attacking contribution

0.16 goals per 90 and 0.32 key passes per 90 are below what would be expected even from a ball-playing center back in the Bundesliga. These figures are not a concern in isolation for a pure defensive CB, but they offer no compensating value to offset the missing defensive picture.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →