Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center back sitting at 50.04 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — whose evaluation is heavily constrained by missing sub-score data across all dimensions. With 1,054 minutes across 16 matches this season, the sample is modest, and a confidence rating of 0.63 signals that conclusions should be treated as provisional. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not what the data shows, but what it cannot: all role-critical sub-scores are null, making a full positional read impossible.
The FQ score of 50.04 reflects a combination of below-baseline raw output and severe data gaps — most critically, the absence of a defense sub-score, which is the primary evaluative dimension for a center back. Without it, the score is driven largely by the available per-90 data (2.05 tackles, 6.6 average rating), which point to a mid-to-low baseline contributor rather than a reliable starter.
Form score of 48.69 sits just 1.35 points below the FQ score of 50.04 — within the ±5 stable band — indicating no meaningful upward or downward momentum. This is a flat trajectory at a below-average baseline, not a recovery or decline story.
Nearly identical FQ score of 50.11 places Dźwigała in the same typical performer band; the key difference is whether Dźwigała's profile carries more complete sub-score data that better explains his positioning.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Alderete Fernández scores 49.62, fractionally below this player, suggesting comparable overall output levels; contextual league and role factors may differentiate their actual defensive contributions.
Diks leads this comparable group at 50.48 and likely operates in a slightly different positional or tactical context, making him a useful ceiling reference within this narrow score band.
All sub-scores — including the defense dimension central to center back evaluation — are null. Tackles, interceptions, duels won, and aerial dominance cannot be assessed, meaning the player's core positional responsibilities are unverifiable from this dataset.
With only 1,054 minutes logged across 16 matches, this player is not a guaranteed starter. Limited minutes reduce statistical reliability and contribute to the 0.63 confidence rating, which sits just at the threshold of meaningful interpretation.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →