Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center back sitting at an FQ Score of 49.62 — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — with 30 matches and 2,599 minutes played this season providing a reliable, high-confidence (0.93) read. The most distinctive feature here is not a strength but an absence: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) return null, meaning the underlying profile cannot confirm competence in any core center-back dimension. At 0.03 goals and 0.03 assists per 90, attacking contribution is negligible, as expected for the role, but 1.04 tackles per 90 and a 6.85 average rating suggest a functional if unspectacular defensive presence.
The FQ Score of 49.62 reflects a player performing at the lower end of the typical range, and with all sub-scores null, no single dimension can be credited or blamed — the score is driven by aggregate output metrics that collectively land below the baseline expectation for a Premier League center back. The 1.04 tackles per 90 and 6.85 rating are the primary observable anchors, neither of which clears the threshold for above-average defensive contribution.
Form score of 50.62 sits just 1.0 point above the FQ Score of 49.62 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing in line with their established level, and the high confidence score (0.93) confirms this is a durable signal, not a temporary fluctuation.
Kolašinac's FQ Score of 50.04 places him in the same fringe-to-typical band; both players share a similar overall output ceiling, though Kolašinac's profile as a more physically aggressive defender may differ in duel intensity.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Dźwigała's FQ Score of 50.11 reflects a near-identical performance tier; the key difference is league context, as Dźwigała operates outside the Premier League, making direct difficulty comparisons less straightforward.
Diks scores 50.48 and represents the upper edge of this comparable cluster; his role flexibility as a fullback/wingback means his scoring inputs differ compositionally even if the headline number aligns.
1.04 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume signal, and it sits below what top-tier Premier League center backs typically register. With the defense sub-score null, this figure is the sole indicator of defensive workload — it does not suggest a player dominating duels or leading defensive actions.
An FQ Score of 49.62 at 0.93 confidence across 30 matches means this is a stable, well-evidenced read — not a small-sample anomaly. The score band (mid-40s to low-50s) indicates a player operating at or below the baseline for a starting Premier League center back, with limited upside visible in the current data.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →