TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Omar Alderete

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Sunderland
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 26, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#15
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Omar Alderete
Omar Alderete
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Sunderland
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 26, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#15
TactiQ Score
74.3
97% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.3
Form Score
71.5
Confidence
97%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.03
Assists
0.03
Key Pass
0.29
Tackles
1.07
Rating
6.86
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Premier League center back sitting at an FQ Score of 49.62 — squarely in the fringe-to-typical range — with 30 matches and 2,599 minutes played this season providing a reliable, high-confidence (0.93) read. The most distinctive feature here is not a strength but an absence: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) return null, meaning the underlying profile cannot confirm competence in any core center-back dimension. At 0.03 goals and 0.03 assists per 90, attacking contribution is negligible, as expected for the role, but 1.04 tackles per 90 and a 6.85 average rating suggest a functional if unspectacular defensive presence.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 49.62 reflects a player performing at the lower end of the typical range, and with all sub-scores null, no single dimension can be credited or blamed — the score is driven by aggregate output metrics that collectively land below the baseline expectation for a Premier League center back. The 1.04 tackles per 90 and 6.85 rating are the primary observable anchors, neither of which clears the threshold for above-average defensive contribution.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 50.62 sits just 1.0 point above the FQ Score of 49.62 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing in line with their established level, and the high confidence score (0.93) confirms this is a durable signal, not a temporary fluctuation.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Sead Kolašinac

Kolašinac's FQ Score of 50.04 places him in the same fringe-to-typical band; both players share a similar overall output ceiling, though Kolašinac's profile as a more physically aggressive defender may differ in duel intensity.

Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
32
Minutes
2779
Goals
1
Assists
1
Key passes
9
Rating
6.86
Tackles
33
Shots on target
9
Successful dribbles
18
Clean sheets
11
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 63.4Form 63.6
Previous
TQ 72.9Form 73.1
Current
TQ 70.9Form 71.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.03
Assists
0.03
Key Passes
0.29
Tackles
1.07
Rating
6.86
Compare →
Adam Dźwigała

Dźwigała's FQ Score of 50.11 reflects a near-identical performance tier; the key difference is league context, as Dźwigała operates outside the Premier League, making direct difficulty comparisons less straightforward.

Compare →
Kevin Diks

Diks scores 50.48 and represents the upper edge of this comparable cluster; his role flexibility as a fullback/wingback means his scoring inputs differ compositionally even if the headline number aligns.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2779 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
33 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
11 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

1.04 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume signal, and it sits below what top-tier Premier League center backs typically register. With the defense sub-score null, this figure is the sole indicator of defensive workload — it does not suggest a player dominating duels or leading defensive actions.

Overall production ceiling

An FQ Score of 49.62 at 0.93 confidence across 30 matches means this is a stable, well-evidenced read — not a small-sample anomaly. The score band (mid-40s to low-50s) indicates a player operating at or below the baseline for a starting Premier League center back, with limited upside visible in the current data.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →