How the system evaluates football.
FOTQUANT is built around methodology-first football intelligence. The platform uses position-aware scoring, identity-blind evaluation before reveal, and market value as a separate analytical layer.
Profiles are scored before identity is emphasized, reducing bias from reputation, badge, and fame.
Players are evaluated with role-appropriate frameworks rather than one flat universal model.
Market value is used for context and value-gap analysis, not as the truth engine of performance.
Current Season Best XI is active-player and season-based. All-Time Best XI is historical, slower-moving, and versioned.
The system should move from evidence to judgment.
What keeps the platform credible.
Ratings should reflect defined logic, not editorial instinct or hype.
Small samples should never be treated with the same confidence as sustained output.
Like-for-like comparison matters. The system should compare roles, profiles, and use cases carefully.
Visuals should clarify judgment, not decorate weak reasoning.
Methodology is not a side page. It shapes the whole platform.
Blind comparison and role-aware evaluation are most visible in the core analytical workspace.
Selections are shaped by methodology, not just name recognition or narrative weight.
Value-gap logic separates market perception from actual football output.
National team analysis will apply the same methodology-first logic in tournament context.