Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center-back sitting at 55.09 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — with 32 appearances and 2,757 minutes this season. The most notable data point is what is absent: all role-specific sub-scores are null, meaning no granular read on defensive output, duels, or progression is available. What the per-90 numbers do show is modest: 1.63 tackles and 0.23 key passes per 90, with an average match rating of 6.98.
The 55.09 FQ score reflects a mid-tier performer with no standout dimension pulling the number higher. Without sub-score breakdowns, the score is anchored primarily by per-90 output — 1.63 tackles per 90 and a 6.98 average rating are around the middle of the range for a Premier League center-back, neither elevating nor significantly dragging the overall figure.
Form score of 55.3 sits just 0.2 points above the FQ score of 55.09 — well within the ±5 stable band. Output has been consistent across the season with no meaningful upward or downward shift.
Blind's FQ score of 56.3 places him in the same typical performer band, reflecting a similar mid-tier defensive profile; Blind carries a higher reputation for ball-playing from the back, which is not evidenced in the current player's available data.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Romero's FQ score of 53.0 sits just below this player's 55.09, making them close comparables on overall output; Romero is known for aggressive duel-winning tendencies that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to null sub-scores.
Diks at 50.48 represents the lower bound of this comparison group, sharing the same mid-range tier; the gap of roughly 4.6 FQ points suggests this player edges Diks on overall contribution, though the absence of sub-scores limits precise dimension-level comparison.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →