Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A La Liga center-back sitting at 56.3 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, but with meaningful data gaps that limit how precisely this can be assessed. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what's missing: all sub-scores are null, meaning no defensive dimension has been fully resolved, which is the core of what a center-back is evaluated on. With 2,536 minutes across 30 matches, the sample is substantial, but the picture remains incomplete.
The 56.3 FQ score is driven primarily by the absence of a resolved defenseScore — the single most important sub-score for a center-back. Without it, the rating reflects consistent but unquantified baseline output, anchored by a 6.85 average match rating and 1.88 tackles per 90, neither of which alone justifies a higher placement on the scale.
Form score of 55.76 sits within 0.5 points of the FQ score of 56.3 — a stable trajectory with no meaningful upward or downward signal. This tight alignment across a 30-match sample suggests consistent, flat output rather than any emerging trend in either direction.
Comparable FQ score of 55.09 places Konaté in the same adequate-starter band; the key difference is that Konaté operates in a higher-profile squad context, which may suppress or inflate his relative score differently.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Romero's FQ score of 53.0 is marginally lower, suggesting a similar overall output level; however, Romero's profile is typically associated with higher physical duel engagement, a dimension that cannot be compared here due to null sub-scores.
Caricol's FQ score of 60.75 sits above this player's 56.3, representing the near-term ceiling if defensive sub-scores resolve positively; the gap likely reflects more complete or more productive underlying data rather than a fundamentally different level of player.
The defenseScore is null despite 30 appearances and 2,536 minutes — the primary evaluation dimension for a center-back cannot be confirmed. Tackle rate of 1.88 per 90 is the only available defensive signal, and it sits in a range that does not distinguish this player from typical starters in the role.
Key passes of 0.39 per 90 is modest for a modern center-back expected to contribute to build-up. Creation and progression sub-scores are both null, so the full picture is unavailable, but the available output does not suggest an above-average ball-playing profile.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →