TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Aarón Martín

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Genoa
Position
Centre Back
Also: Defender
Date of Birth
Apr 22, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#3
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Aarón Martín
Aarón Martín
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Genoa
Position
Centre Back
Also: Defender
Date of Birth
Apr 22, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#3
TactiQ Score
73.3
91% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
73.3
Form Score
69.5
Confidence
91%
Role
center_back
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.22
Key Pass
2.56
Tackles
1.68
Rating
6.94
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Serie A center-back sitting at 60.75 on the FQ scale — the lower end of the adequate-starter band — whose most distinctive feature is an inverted profile: creation (58.84) outpaces defense (42.75), an unusual split for the position. Across 29 matches and 2,025 minutes this season, the defensive output is the primary concern, with a defense sub-score that falls below baseline for a center-back. Ball-playing contribution offers some value, but it does not compensate for the defensive shortfall.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 60.75 is anchored downward by a defense sub-score of 42.75 — below the 55-69 mid-range baseline expected for a center-back — combined with a progression score of 31.25, which limits any claim to being an effective ball-carrier from deep. Creation at 58.84 is the only sub-score approaching average, and it is not enough to lift the overall rating.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable: the form score of 58.82 sits just 1.93 points below the FQ score of 60.75, well within the ±5 threshold. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend — this player is performing consistently at their established level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Daley Blind

Both sit in the 56-61 FQ range with a ball-playing profile that outweighs their defensive output; Blind carries a slightly higher FQ score (56.3 vs this player's 60.75) but is typically deployed in a more possession-dominant system that inflates creation metrics.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
2100
Goals
1
Assists
5
Key passes
60
Rating
6.95
Tackles
41
Shots on target
4
Successful dribbles
13
Clean sheets
7
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 63.2Form 63.4
Previous
TQ 75.3Form 75.3
Current
TQ 69.5Form 69.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.22
Key Passes
2.56
Tackles
1.68
Rating
6.94
Ibrahima Konaté

Comparable FQ score (55.09) and a similarly uneven sub-score spread for a center-back; Konaté's profile leans more on physical duel contribution whereas this player's relative edge is in creation.

Compare →
Gabriel dos Santos Magalhães

Nearest FQ score (54.65) among the comparables, with a shared tendency toward ball-playing involvement from the back; Gabriel operates in a higher-pressing system, which contextually drives different defensive action volumes.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2100 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
41 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

A defense sub-score of 42.75 is below baseline for a center-back — the position's core function. At 1.69 tackles per 90, the volume of defensive actions is modest, and the sub-score suggests gaps in duels, interceptions, or aerial dominance that are meaningful for this role.

Progression

A progression sub-score of 31.25 is a clear weakness. For a modern center-back expected to drive play forward, this limits build-up impact and means the creation score of 58.84 is not being reinforced by ball-carrying or line-breaking passes.

Possession control

A possession control sub-score of 27.07 is low and compounds the progression weakness — suggesting the player struggles to retain the ball under pressure, which is a meaningful gap for a center-back in a possession-oriented league like Serie A.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →