Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center-back sitting at 60.75 on the FQ scale — the lower end of the adequate-starter band — whose most distinctive feature is an inverted profile: creation (58.84) outpaces defense (42.75), an unusual split for the position. Across 29 matches and 2,025 minutes this season, the defensive output is the primary concern, with a defense sub-score that falls below baseline for a center-back. Ball-playing contribution offers some value, but it does not compensate for the defensive shortfall.
The FQ Score of 60.75 is anchored downward by a defense sub-score of 42.75 — below the 55-69 mid-range baseline expected for a center-back — combined with a progression score of 31.25, which limits any claim to being an effective ball-carrier from deep. Creation at 58.84 is the only sub-score approaching average, and it is not enough to lift the overall rating.
Form is stable: the form score of 58.82 sits just 1.93 points below the FQ score of 60.75, well within the ±5 threshold. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend — this player is performing consistently at their established level.
Both sit in the 56-61 FQ range with a ball-playing profile that outweighs their defensive output; Blind carries a slightly higher FQ score (56.3 vs this player's 60.75) but is typically deployed in a more possession-dominant system that inflates creation metrics.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable FQ score (55.09) and a similarly uneven sub-score spread for a center-back; Konaté's profile leans more on physical duel contribution whereas this player's relative edge is in creation.
Nearest FQ score (54.65) among the comparables, with a shared tendency toward ball-playing involvement from the back; Gabriel operates in a higher-pressing system, which contextually drives different defensive action volumes.
A defense sub-score of 42.75 is below baseline for a center-back — the position's core function. At 1.69 tackles per 90, the volume of defensive actions is modest, and the sub-score suggests gaps in duels, interceptions, or aerial dominance that are meaningful for this role.
A progression sub-score of 31.25 is a clear weakness. For a modern center-back expected to drive play forward, this limits build-up impact and means the creation score of 58.84 is not being reinforced by ball-carrying or line-breaking passes.
A possession control sub-score of 27.07 is low and compounds the progression weakness — suggesting the player struggles to retain the ball under pressure, which is a meaningful gap for a center-back in a possession-oriented league like Serie A.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →