TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Ramy Bensebaini

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Borussia Dortmund
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Apr 16, 1995 (31)
Jersey Number
#5
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Ramy Bensebaini
Ramy Bensebaini
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Borussia Dortmund
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Apr 16, 1995 (31)
Jersey Number
#5
TactiQ Score
70.9
78% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.9
Form Score
69.2
Confidence
78%
Role
center_back
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.29
Assists
0.12
Key Pass
0.59
Tackles
1.71
Rating
7.20
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 53.94 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with 21 appearances and 1,526 minutes this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what's missing: all sub-scores (defense, progression, creation, finishing) are null, meaning the score is built on surface-level per-90 metrics rather than a full dimensional read. At 0.29 goals and 1.71 tackles per 90, the output is modest for the role.

Why this score

The FQ score of 53.94 is anchored primarily by per-90 defensive volume — 1.71 tackles per 90 is the most concrete data point available — but the absence of a defense sub-score means core center-back dimensions (duel success rate, aerial wins, interceptions) cannot be evaluated. This data gap is the single biggest driver of uncertainty in the score.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 51.25 sits 2.69 points below the FQ score of 53.94 — within the ±5 stable band, but on the softer side. The trend is marginally declining rather than flat, and the data is approximately 47 hours old, introducing mild staleness risk to the current form read.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Cristian Gabriel Romero

Both sit in the low-to-mid 50s on the FQ scale as center-backs, but Romero's profile carries more aggressive defensive action data whereas this player's sub-scores are entirely null, making direct comparison limited.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
21
Minutes
1526
Goals
5
Assists
2
Key passes
10
Rating
7.20
Tackles
29
Shots on target
7
Successful dribbles
5
Clean sheets
9
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 70.3Form 70.3
Previous
TQ 70.8Form 70.8
Current
TQ 69.2Form 69.2
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.29
Assists
0.12
Key Passes
0.59
Tackles
1.71
Rating
7.20
Ibrahima Konaté

Konaté's FQ score of 55.09 places him in the same typical-performer band, with a similar positional profile; Konaté, however, operates in a higher-profile league context which likely inflates the difficulty weighting of his score.

Compare →
Daley Blind

Blind's 56.3 FQ score is the ceiling of this comparable group and reflects a more complete data profile; the key difference is Blind's documented contribution to progression and possession phases, which remain unscored for this player.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.20 in the current season snapshot.
Defensive activity
29 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

The defense sub-score is null despite this being a center-back — the primary role dimension cannot be assessed. With only 1.71 tackles per 90 visible, there is no read on duel success rate, aerial dominance, or interception volume, which are the metrics that define center-back quality.

Attacking contribution

0.29 goals and 0.12 assists per 90 with 0.59 key passes per 90 are below what would be expected from a modern ball-playing center-back contributing to build-up. Creation and progression sub-scores are also null, so the full picture remains incomplete.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →