Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 53.94 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with 21 appearances and 1,526 minutes this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what's missing: all sub-scores (defense, progression, creation, finishing) are null, meaning the score is built on surface-level per-90 metrics rather than a full dimensional read. At 0.29 goals and 1.71 tackles per 90, the output is modest for the role.
The FQ score of 53.94 is anchored primarily by per-90 defensive volume — 1.71 tackles per 90 is the most concrete data point available — but the absence of a defense sub-score means core center-back dimensions (duel success rate, aerial wins, interceptions) cannot be evaluated. This data gap is the single biggest driver of uncertainty in the score.
Form score of 51.25 sits 2.69 points below the FQ score of 53.94 — within the ±5 stable band, but on the softer side. The trend is marginally declining rather than flat, and the data is approximately 47 hours old, introducing mild staleness risk to the current form read.
Both sit in the low-to-mid 50s on the FQ scale as center-backs, but Romero's profile carries more aggressive defensive action data whereas this player's sub-scores are entirely null, making direct comparison limited.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Konaté's FQ score of 55.09 places him in the same typical-performer band, with a similar positional profile; Konaté, however, operates in a higher-profile league context which likely inflates the difficulty weighting of his score.
Blind's 56.3 FQ score is the ceiling of this comparable group and reflects a more complete data profile; the key difference is Blind's documented contribution to progression and possession phases, which remain unscored for this player.
The defense sub-score is null despite this being a center-back — the primary role dimension cannot be assessed. With only 1.71 tackles per 90 visible, there is no read on duel success rate, aerial dominance, or interception volume, which are the metrics that define center-back quality.
0.29 goals and 0.12 assists per 90 with 0.59 key passes per 90 are below what would be expected from a modern ball-playing center-back contributing to build-up. Creation and progression sub-scores are also null, so the full picture remains incomplete.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →