TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Fikayo Tomori

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
AC Milan
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 19, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#23
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Fikayo Tomori
Fikayo Tomori
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
AC Milan
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 19, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#23
TactiQ Score
70.7
93% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.7
Form Score
69.3
Confidence
93%
Role
center_back
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.07
Key Pass
0.15
Tackles
2.41
Rating
6.89
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Serie A center back sitting at 55.62 on the FQ scale — squarely in the adequate-starter tier with clear gaps. The most notable data point is the complete absence of sub-scores across all dimensions, which limits how precisely this profile can be read; what is available points to a player contributing at a baseline level without standing out in any measurable category. With 2,403 minutes across 30 matches, the sample is solid and the 0.9 confidence score means this reading is reliable.

Why this score

The FQ score of 55.62 is driven primarily by the absence of any sub-score above the baseline threshold — no dimension clears 70, and the missing defenseScore is a critical blind spot for a center back whose entire value proposition rests on defensive output. The per-90 assist rate of 0.07 and key pass rate of 0.15 confirm minimal attacking contribution, which is expected for the role, but without defensive sub-scores there is no offsetting strength to push the score higher.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 57.8 sits 2.2 points above the FQ score of 55.62, placing this player in the stable band (within ±5). There is no meaningful upward or downward signal — recent output is consistent with the season-long baseline rather than indicating a trend in either direction.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ibrahima Konaté

Both sit in the 55-56 FQ range for a center back role, reflecting adequate-starter profiles; Konaté's score of 55.09 is marginally lower, but he operates in a higher-difficulty league environment which contextually differentiates the two readings.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
2427
Assists
2
Key passes
4
Rating
6.89
Tackles
65
Shots on target
2
Successful dribbles
3
Clean sheets
15
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 67.6Form 67.7
Previous
TQ 69.1Form 69.3
Current
TQ 68.7Form 69.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.07
Key Passes
0.15
Tackles
2.41
Rating
6.89
Daley Blind

Blind's FQ score of 56.3 is the closest match in this comparable set, suggesting a similar overall output level; the key difference is that Blind's profile typically includes meaningful left-sided progression contributions, a dimension not visible in this player's data.

Compare →
Cristian Gabriel Romero

Romero's FQ score of 53.0 sits slightly below this player's 55.62, making them broadly comparable in tier; Romero's profile is distinguished by higher physical duel intensity, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to missing sub-scores.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2427 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
65 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
15 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive sub-score visibility

All sub-scores including defenseScore are null, meaning tackles (2.43 per 90), duels, aerial dominance, and interceptions cannot be quality-assessed — only raw volume is visible. For a center back, this is the single most important gap in the profile.

Attacking contribution

0.07 assists and 0.15 key passes per 90 are minimal, though this is broadly expected for the role. The concern is that with no creation or progression sub-scores available, it is impossible to confirm whether the player contributes meaningfully to build-up play — a growing requirement for modern center backs in Serie A.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →