Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center back sitting at 55.62 on the FQ scale — squarely in the adequate-starter tier with clear gaps. The most notable data point is the complete absence of sub-scores across all dimensions, which limits how precisely this profile can be read; what is available points to a player contributing at a baseline level without standing out in any measurable category. With 2,403 minutes across 30 matches, the sample is solid and the 0.9 confidence score means this reading is reliable.
The FQ score of 55.62 is driven primarily by the absence of any sub-score above the baseline threshold — no dimension clears 70, and the missing defenseScore is a critical blind spot for a center back whose entire value proposition rests on defensive output. The per-90 assist rate of 0.07 and key pass rate of 0.15 confirm minimal attacking contribution, which is expected for the role, but without defensive sub-scores there is no offsetting strength to push the score higher.
Form score of 57.8 sits 2.2 points above the FQ score of 55.62, placing this player in the stable band (within ±5). There is no meaningful upward or downward signal — recent output is consistent with the season-long baseline rather than indicating a trend in either direction.
Both sit in the 55-56 FQ range for a center back role, reflecting adequate-starter profiles; Konaté's score of 55.09 is marginally lower, but he operates in a higher-difficulty league environment which contextually differentiates the two readings.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Blind's FQ score of 56.3 is the closest match in this comparable set, suggesting a similar overall output level; the key difference is that Blind's profile typically includes meaningful left-sided progression contributions, a dimension not visible in this player's data.
Romero's FQ score of 53.0 sits slightly below this player's 55.62, making them broadly comparable in tier; Romero's profile is distinguished by higher physical duel intensity, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied here due to missing sub-scores.
All sub-scores including defenseScore are null, meaning tackles (2.43 per 90), duels, aerial dominance, and interceptions cannot be quality-assessed — only raw volume is visible. For a center back, this is the single most important gap in the profile.
0.07 assists and 0.15 key passes per 90 are minimal, though this is broadly expected for the role. The concern is that with no creation or progression sub-scores available, it is impossible to confirm whether the player contributes meaningfully to build-up play — a growing requirement for modern center backs in Serie A.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →