Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 56.88 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, meeting positional baseline requirements without standing out in any measurable dimension. The most distinctive data point is a tackles rate of 2.38 per 90, which signals active defensive engagement, though the absence of granular sub-scores (duels won, interceptions, aerial success) prevents a fuller picture of defensive quality. At 29 appearances and 2,610 minutes this season, the sample is substantial and the 0.91 confidence score makes this reading reliable.
With all role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, possession control, physical duel) returning null, the FQ score of 56.88 is driven by aggregate output rather than any standout dimension — the data reflects consistent but unspectacular contribution across the board. The 7.08 average match rating and 0.07 goals per 90 are both mid-range figures that anchor the score firmly in the 50-59 "typical performer" band.
Recent form score of 61.12 sits 4.24 points above the FQ score of 56.88 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward an upward signal. This is consistent with the risk/form agent's read of an improving trajectory; not a breakout trend, but no decline concern either.
Comparable FQ scores (56.3 vs 56.88) reflect similar mid-tier starter profiles; Blind historically offers more progressive passing output from the back, which this player's 0.28 key passes per 90 does not match.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Konaté's 55.09 FQ score places him in the same adequate-starter band; Konaté is associated with stronger aerial and physical duel metrics, an area this player cannot be assessed on due to null sub-scores.
The highest-scoring comparable at 60.75, Martín Caricol represents the ceiling of this peer group; the gap of roughly 4 FQ points suggests this player would need measurable improvement in at least one role-specific dimension to reach that level.
All role-critical sub-scores — defense, physical duel, progression — are null, meaning the 2.38 tackles per 90 is the only direct defensive signal available. For a center back, the absence of duel success rate, aerial win rate, and interception data is a meaningful gap that prevents confirming whether the tackle volume translates into defensive effectiveness.
Key passes sit at just 0.28 per 90 with no assists recorded, and the creation and progression sub-scores are null. For a modern Bundesliga center back where ball-playing ability is increasingly valued, this limits the player's contribution profile to primarily reactive defending rather than build-up initiation.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →