Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center-back sitting at 53.49 on the FQ scale — typical performer territory, below the baseline expected of a regular starter at this level. Across 31 appearances (2,701 minutes), the most notable output is a 6.93 average match rating and 1.2 tackles per 90, but the absence of granular sub-score data limits a full positional read. No dimension stands out as a clear strength.
With all sub-scores (defense, progression, physical duels) returning null, the FQ Score of 53.49 is driven primarily by surface-level output metrics — a modest 1.2 tackles per 90 and 0.4 key passes per 90 that do not suggest standout contribution in any role-defining area for a center-back. The absence of a defense sub-score is the single biggest gap in evaluating this player's true positional value.
Form score of 51.08 sits 2.4 points below the FQ score of 53.49 — within the stable range (±5), indicating no meaningful acceleration or decline. Output has been consistent but flat across the season.
Both sit in the 53–55 FQ range as Premier League center-backs; Romero's score reflects a more physically aggressive profile, whereas this player's data lacks the sub-score visibility to confirm a similar defensive intensity.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Konaté's 55.09 FQ score is marginally higher and is underpinned by stronger aerial and physical duel metrics typical of his profile — a ceiling this player has not demonstrably reached based on available data.
Blind's 56.3 FQ score reflects a possession-oriented center-back role; this player's 0.4 key passes per 90 suggests a similarly limited creative output, though Blind's progression metrics are better documented.
1.2 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume metric, and with no defense sub-score calculable, there is no evidence of standout duel-winning, interception, or aerial output — all primary benchmarks for a Premier League center-back.
0.4 key passes per 90 and 0.03 assists per 90 indicate minimal contribution to build-up play, which matters for a modern center-back expected to drive play out from the back.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →