Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-to-adequate Premier League center back sitting at 59.48 on the FQ scale — the lower end of the "adequate starter" band. The most distinctive data point is a tackles rate of 3.26 per 90, which signals active defensive engagement, though the absence of all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) means the full picture remains incomplete. At 22 appearances and 1,796 minutes this season, the sample is meaningful but the ceiling here looks modest.
With all four sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 59.48 is driven primarily by per-90 surface metrics — notably a 6.92 average rating and 3.26 tackles per 90 — rather than dimensional depth. The absence of a defense sub-score is the single biggest limiter: for a center back, that dimension would normally be the primary score driver, and its absence introduces meaningful uncertainty around the final figure.
Form score of 63.92 sits 4.44 points above the FQ score of 59.48 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward an upward signal. This is consistent with the risk-form agent's read of a modest improving trajectory, though the delta is not large enough to call a clear breakout.
Both sit in the 59-61 FQ range as defensively active center backs with limited attacking output; Aarón Martín Caricol edges ahead at 60.75, suggesting marginally more consistent overall contribution.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Blind's 56.3 FQ score reflects a similar adequate-but-unspectacular defensive profile; the key difference is Blind's historically stronger ball-playing and progression metrics, a dimension this player cannot yet be assessed on due to null sub-scores.
Konaté's 55.09 FQ score places him just below this player despite playing in a higher-profile role, suggesting comparable output levels; Konaté's profile is more physically dominant, whereas this player's 3.26 tackles per 90 points to a more positionally active style.
All sub-scores including defense are null, which is a critical gap for a center back. Tackles at 3.26 per 90 suggest active involvement, but without duel success rates, interceptions, or aerial data, it is impossible to confirm whether that activity translates to defensive effectiveness.
0.05 goals per 90 and 0.55 key passes per 90 are low, though for a center back these figures are not alarming in isolation. The concern is the lack of any creation or progression sub-score to confirm whether the player contributes meaningfully in build-up play.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →