TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Kenny Tete

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Fulham
Position
Centre Back
Also: Defender
Date of Birth
Oct 9, 1995 (30)
Jersey Number
#2
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Kenny Tete
Kenny Tete
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Fulham
Position
Centre Back
Also: Defender
Date of Birth
Oct 9, 1995 (30)
Jersey Number
#2
TactiQ Score
72.9
80% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
72.9
Form Score
71.6
Confidence
80%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.05
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.55
Tackles
3.26
Rating
6.92
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A fringe-to-adequate Premier League center back sitting at 59.48 on the FQ scale — the lower end of the "adequate starter" band. The most distinctive data point is a tackles rate of 3.26 per 90, which signals active defensive engagement, though the absence of all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) means the full picture remains incomplete. At 22 appearances and 1,796 minutes this season, the sample is meaningful but the ceiling here looks modest.

Why this score

With all four sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 59.48 is driven primarily by per-90 surface metrics — notably a 6.92 average rating and 3.26 tackles per 90 — rather than dimensional depth. The absence of a defense sub-score is the single biggest limiter: for a center back, that dimension would normally be the primary score driver, and its absence introduces meaningful uncertainty around the final figure.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 63.92 sits 4.44 points above the FQ score of 59.48 — within the ±5 stable band, but nudging toward an upward signal. This is consistent with the risk-form agent's read of a modest improving trajectory, though the delta is not large enough to call a clear breakout.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Aarón Martín Caricol

Both sit in the 59-61 FQ range as defensively active center backs with limited attacking output; Aarón Martín Caricol edges ahead at 60.75, suggesting marginally more consistent overall contribution.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
22
Minutes
1796
Goals
1
Key passes
11
Rating
6.92
Tackles
65
Shots on target
3
Successful dribbles
8
Clean sheets
6
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 64.9Form 65.3
Previous
TQ 70.3Form 70.5
Current
TQ 71.1Form 71.6
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.05
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.55
Tackles
3.26
Rating
6.92
Daley Blind

Blind's 56.3 FQ score reflects a similar adequate-but-unspectacular defensive profile; the key difference is Blind's historically stronger ball-playing and progression metrics, a dimension this player cannot yet be assessed on due to null sub-scores.

Compare →
Ibrahima Konaté

Konaté's 55.09 FQ score places him just below this player despite playing in a higher-profile role, suggesting comparable output levels; Konaté's profile is more physically dominant, whereas this player's 3.26 tackles per 90 points to a more positionally active style.

Compare →
Defensive activity
65 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive sub-score unavailable

All sub-scores including defense are null, which is a critical gap for a center back. Tackles at 3.26 per 90 suggest active involvement, but without duel success rates, interceptions, or aerial data, it is impossible to confirm whether that activity translates to defensive effectiveness.

Attacking contribution

0.05 goals per 90 and 0.55 key passes per 90 are low, though for a center back these figures are not alarming in isolation. The concern is the lack of any creation or progression sub-score to confirm whether the player contributes meaningfully in build-up play.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →