Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League center-back sitting at 54.35 on the FQ scale — a typical performer profile, placing him in the 50-59 band where output meets the minimum bar without exceeding it. Across 34 appearances (3,060 minutes), his 0.65 tackles per 90 and 0.32 key passes per 90 reflect a functional but unremarkable defensive presence. The absence of granular sub-scores limits deeper role analysis, but the composite picture is consistent: adequate, not competitive at the top end of the division.
The FQ score of 54.35 is primarily explained by a performance agent reading of 49 — just below the baseline threshold for center-backs — indicating deficiencies in at least one core defensive dimension. With all role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) returning null, the score is driven by composite output that fails to signal strength in any measurable area.
Form score of 52.29 sits 2.06 points below the FQ score of 54.35 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful decline or uplift. Output has been consistent across the season, though consistently at a below-average level.
Both sit in the 54-56 FQ range for center-backs, reflecting similar composite output levels; Konaté's score of 55.09 edges higher, suggesting a marginal advantage in at least one measurable dimension.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Romero's FQ score of 53.00 places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close statistical peer; the key difference is Romero's profile is associated with a more aggressive, duel-heavy defensive style that may not be reflected in this player's output.
Blind's 56.30 FQ score is the highest of the three comparables, suggesting slightly stronger composite contribution; his profile historically leans on positional intelligence and passing rather than physical defensive metrics, offering a different route to a similar score band.
All defensive sub-scores are null, preventing direct measurement, but the performance agent score of 49 falls below the 50-point baseline for center-backs — implying the defensive contribution does not meet typical positional expectations in the Premier League.
0.12 goals per 90 and 0.32 key passes per 90 are low even by center-back standards, where set-piece threat and progressive passing are increasingly valued. No creation or progression sub-score is available to contextualize further.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →