TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Virgil van Dijk 

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Liverpool
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Jul 8, 1991 (34)
Jersey Number
#4
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Virgil van Dijk 
Virgil van Dijk 
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Liverpool
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Jul 8, 1991 (34)
Jersey Number
#4
TactiQ Score
78.8
94% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
78.8
Form Score
74.9
Confidence
94%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.11
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.31
Tackles
0.61
Rating
7.08
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Premier League center-back sitting at 54.35 on the FQ scale — a typical performer profile, placing him in the 50-59 band where output meets the minimum bar without exceeding it. Across 34 appearances (3,060 minutes), his 0.65 tackles per 90 and 0.32 key passes per 90 reflect a functional but unremarkable defensive presence. The absence of granular sub-scores limits deeper role analysis, but the composite picture is consistent: adequate, not competitive at the top end of the division.

Why this score

The FQ score of 54.35 is primarily explained by a performance agent reading of 49 — just below the baseline threshold for center-backs — indicating deficiencies in at least one core defensive dimension. With all role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) returning null, the score is driven by composite output that fails to signal strength in any measurable area.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 52.29 sits 2.06 points below the FQ score of 54.35 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful decline or uplift. Output has been consistent across the season, though consistently at a below-average level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ibrahima Konaté

Both sit in the 54-56 FQ range for center-backs, reflecting similar composite output levels; Konaté's score of 55.09 edges higher, suggesting a marginal advantage in at least one measurable dimension.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
36
Minutes
3240
Goals
4
Key passes
11
Rating
7.08
Tackles
22
Shots on target
13
Successful dribbles
2
Clean sheets
10
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 76.8Form 77.0
Previous
TQ 78.1Form 78.4
Current
TQ 74.4Form 74.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.11
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.31
Tackles
0.61
Rating
7.08
Cristian Gabriel Romero

Romero's FQ score of 53.00 places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close statistical peer; the key difference is Romero's profile is associated with a more aggressive, duel-heavy defensive style that may not be reflected in this player's output.

Compare →
Daley Blind

Blind's 56.30 FQ score is the highest of the three comparables, suggesting slightly stronger composite contribution; his profile historically leans on positional intelligence and passing rather than physical defensive metrics, offering a different route to a similar score band.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
3240 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
22 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
10 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

All defensive sub-scores are null, preventing direct measurement, but the performance agent score of 49 falls below the 50-point baseline for center-backs — implying the defensive contribution does not meet typical positional expectations in the Premier League.

Attacking contribution

0.12 goals per 90 and 0.32 key passes per 90 are low even by center-back standards, where set-piece threat and progressive passing are increasingly valued. No creation or progression sub-score is available to contextualize further.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →