Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center-back sitting at 52.76 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range (50-59) — with 30 appearances and 2,283 minutes this season. The most distinctive feature here is consistency at a modest level: form and overall scores are nearly identical, meaning this is not a player in flux but one performing at a stable, unremarkable baseline. Defensive output per 90 is limited, with 1.3 tackles and a 6.78 average match rating offering little separation from the positional median.
With all sub-scores null, the FQ score of 52.76 is driven primarily by aggregate output metrics — notably a 1.3 tackles-per-90 rate and a 6.78 match rating that together suggest below-baseline defensive contribution for a center-back role. The performance agent's assessment of 47 underlines that no single defensive dimension is producing at a standout level.
Form score of 49.81 sits just 2.95 points below the FQ score of 52.76 — within the ±5 stable band. This is not a player trending up or declining sharply; the near-identical form and overall scores across a 30-match sample indicate a sustained, flat performance level.
Both sit in the 50-54 FQ range as center-backs, reflecting similar overall output levels; Romero's score of 53 is marginally higher, suggesting a slight edge in at least one defensive dimension.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Diks scores 50.48, the closest FQ match in this peer group, indicating comparable aggregate contribution; as a fullback rather than center-back, his role demands differ in width and attacking output.
Konaté's 55.09 FQ score sits just above this player's 52.76, making him a useful ceiling reference at this tier; the gap, while small, likely reflects stronger duel or aerial metrics expected of a top-league center-back.
1.3 tackles per 90 is the primary available defensive metric, and for a center-back in Serie A it signals limited active defensive engagement. No interception or clearance data is available to offset this reading.
0.04 assists and 0.12 key passes per 90 are negligible for any role, including center-back — this player adds virtually nothing in the build-up or creation phases.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →