Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center back sitting at 59.47 on the FQ scale — the upper end of the "adequate starter" band, but with clear distance from the 70+ tier that signals consistent above-baseline contribution. The most distinctive feature of this profile is its uniformity: overall FQ (59.47) and form score (59.25) are nearly identical, pointing to a player who delivers a predictable, unspectacular output across 2,121 minutes this season. With 1.02 key passes per 90 and 2.12 tackles per 90, there is some ball-playing involvement, but no single dimension stands out as a genuine strength.
The FQ score of 59.47 is primarily explained by mid-range production across all observable metrics — no sub-score clears the 70 threshold needed to elevate the overall rating. The absence of granular defensive sub-scores (duels won, interceptions, blocks) means the assessment leans heavily on per-90 output, where 2.12 tackles and a 7.23 average rating reflect adequate but not standout defensive contribution for a Serie A center back.
Form score (59.25) sits just -0.22 below the FQ score (59.47), a delta well within the ±5 stable band. There is no upward or downward momentum — this player has been producing at a consistent, flat level across the current sample of 26 matches.
Both occupy a similar FQ band (59.47 vs 60.75) reflecting adequate starter-level output; Aarón Martín Caricol edges ahead marginally, suggesting slightly more consistent or multi-dimensional contribution.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable in overall FQ territory (56.3) with a profile built on positional reliability rather than standout metrics; Blind's career context in higher-profile leagues may account for the modest gap.
Sits at 55.09 FQ, close in overall score but likely diverges in physical duel dominance — an area where Konaté's profile is typically more defined than what this player's available data can confirm.
All four sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning role-critical dimensions — duels won, interceptions, aerial dominance — cannot be directly evaluated. For a center back, this is a meaningful gap: 2.12 tackles per 90 is the only defensive volume signal available, and it sits in a mid-range band without positional benchmarking.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →