TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Berat Djimsiti

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Atalanta
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Feb 19, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#19
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Berat Djimsiti
Berat Djimsiti
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Atalanta
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Feb 19, 1993 (33)
Jersey Number
#19
TactiQ Score
77.7
91% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
77.7
Form Score
73.2
Confidence
91%
Role
center_back
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.19
Tackles
1.90
Rating
6.98
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Serie A center-back sitting at 54.69 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with 2,266 minutes across 30 matches this season providing a reliable sample. The most distinctive feature here is not a strength but a diagnostic gap: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duels, progression) are null, meaning the composite score is the primary signal. At this score level, the player meets some positional baselines but carries clear performance gaps relative to above-average starters in the division.

Why this score

The FQ score of 54.69 is driven primarily by below-baseline composite performance for a center-back role, with the performance specialist internally scoring this player at 49 before blending. The absence of granular defensive sub-scores — duels, interceptions, aerial output — means the score cannot be explained by any single measurable dimension, but the overall signal is consistent across all three evaluation agents.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable, with the form score of 53.37 sitting just 1.32 points below the FQ score of 54.69 — well within the ±5 threshold for a stable trajectory. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend to flag; the player is performing consistently at this level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Ibrahima Konaté

Konaté's FQ score of 55.09 places him at a nearly identical overall level; the key difference is that Konaté's profile carries more physical presence data, whereas this player's null sub-scores make direct dimension-level comparison impossible.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

8 metrics surfaced
Appearances
32
Minutes
2413
Key passes
5
Rating
6.98
Tackles
51
Shots on target
2
Successful dribbles
3
Clean sheets
12
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2413 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 75.5Form 76.1
Previous
TQ 74.8Form 75.0
Current
TQ 72.6Form 73.2
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.19
Tackles
1.90
Rating
6.98
Daley Blind

Blind's FQ score of 56.3 is the ceiling of this comparable band — a left-footed, ball-playing center-back whose value comes from distribution rather than defensive dominance, a contrast to the limited diagnostic data available here.

Compare →
Cristian Gabriel Romero

Romero's FQ score of 53.0 sits just below this player's 54.69, making him the closest floor comparison; both occupy the typical performer range for center-backs, though Romero's profile is better documented at the sub-score level.

Compare →
Defensive activity
51 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
12 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output visibility

All role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duels, progression) returned null, meaning there is no measurable read on tackles won, aerial duels, interceptions, or clearances — the core outputs expected from a Serie A center-back. The only available defensive data point is 1.83 tackles per 90, which sits around the middle range for the position.

Attacking contribution

Key passes of 0.16 per 90 and no registered goals or assists this season are consistent with the role, but offer no upside signal that compensates for the gaps in defensive metrics. There is no creation or progression sub-score to suggest ball-playing value either.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →