Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center-back sitting at 54.69 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with 2,266 minutes across 30 matches this season providing a reliable sample. The most distinctive feature here is not a strength but a diagnostic gap: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duels, progression) are null, meaning the composite score is the primary signal. At this score level, the player meets some positional baselines but carries clear performance gaps relative to above-average starters in the division.
The FQ score of 54.69 is driven primarily by below-baseline composite performance for a center-back role, with the performance specialist internally scoring this player at 49 before blending. The absence of granular defensive sub-scores — duels, interceptions, aerial output — means the score cannot be explained by any single measurable dimension, but the overall signal is consistent across all three evaluation agents.
Form is stable, with the form score of 53.37 sitting just 1.32 points below the FQ score of 54.69 — well within the ±5 threshold for a stable trajectory. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend to flag; the player is performing consistently at this level.
Konaté's FQ score of 55.09 places him at a nearly identical overall level; the key difference is that Konaté's profile carries more physical presence data, whereas this player's null sub-scores make direct dimension-level comparison impossible.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Blind's FQ score of 56.3 is the ceiling of this comparable band — a left-footed, ball-playing center-back whose value comes from distribution rather than defensive dominance, a contrast to the limited diagnostic data available here.
Romero's FQ score of 53.0 sits just below this player's 54.69, making him the closest floor comparison; both occupy the typical performer range for center-backs, though Romero's profile is better documented at the sub-score level.
All role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duels, progression) returned null, meaning there is no measurable read on tackles won, aerial duels, interceptions, or clearances — the core outputs expected from a Serie A center-back. The only available defensive data point is 1.83 tackles per 90, which sits around the middle range for the position.
Key passes of 0.16 per 90 and no registered goals or assists this season are consistent with the role, but offer no upside signal that compensates for the gaps in defensive metrics. There is no creation or progression sub-score to suggest ball-playing value either.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →