Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 center back sitting at 51.76 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — across 29 matches and 2,492 minutes this season. The most notable data point is what is absent: all role-critical sub-scores (defense, progression, possession control, physical duel) are null, meaning the composite score is the primary signal. At this level, the player meets some positional baselines but falls short of what is expected from a reliable starter in a competitive top-flight environment.
The FQ score of 51.76 is driven by a mid-range composite with no sub-score granularity to identify a standout dimension. The per-90 data available — 1.19 tackles, 0.47 key passes, and a 7.04 average rating — are functional but not distinguishing figures for a center back at this level.
Form score of 52.04 sits just 0.28 points above the FQ score of 51.76 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing at a consistent, flat level across the current sample.
Romero's FQ score of 53 places him in the same typical-performer band; both players share a similar composite ceiling, though Romero's score comes with a higher-profile league context that may reflect a more demanding defensive environment.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Diks scores 50.48, nearly identical to this player's 51.76, reflecting comparable overall output; the key difference is positional versatility — Diks operates across the backline rather than as a specialist center back.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score is the closest match in the comparable set, suggesting a similar tier of center back contribution; both sit just above the fringe threshold with limited elite-dimension separation.
All defensive sub-scores (tackles, interceptions, duels, aerial) are null despite 91% data completeness. The only available defensive signal is 1.19 tackles per 90, which is a thin basis for evaluating a center back's core function and limits confidence in any positive defensive read.
Key passes sit at 0.47 per 90 and assists at 0.07 — modest output for a modern center back expected to contribute to build-up. With progression sub-score also null, there is no data to suggest this player is an active ball-carrier or distributor from deep.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →