TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Frank Anguissa 

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Napoli
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Nov 16, 1995 (30)
Jersey Number
#99
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Frank Anguissa 
Frank Anguissa 
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Napoli
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Nov 16, 1995 (30)
Jersey Number
#99
TactiQ Score
69.2
73% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.2
Form Score
61.3
Confidence
73%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.29
Assists
0.07
Key Pass
0.93
Tackles
1.29
Rating
6.99
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A below-baseline central midfielder in Serie A with an FQ Score of 49.21, placing him in the typical-to-fringe performer range. His per-90 output — 0.29 goals, 0.07 assists, and 0.88 key passes — reflects limited creative and attacking contribution for the position. With 1,227 minutes across 17 matches, the sample is sufficient to treat this reading as reliable rather than a small-sample anomaly.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 49.21 is driven by consistently low production across the central midfielder role's core demands — creation, progression, and defensive output — none of which reach a level that offsets the others. All dimensional sub-scores are null, meaning no single area stands out as a compensating strength; the overall score reflects a flat, below-baseline profile across the board.

Form Trajectory

Form is in a soft decline — the form score of 44.54 sits 4.67 points below the FQ Score of 49.21, which is just inside the stable-to-declining boundary. Recent output is not improving the overall read; if the gap widens further, this becomes a meaningful concern.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Emanuele Giaccherini

Nearly identical FQ Score (49.15 vs 49.21) reflects a comparable level of overall contribution for a central midfielder; Giaccherini's career profile skews more toward wide and attacking roles, whereas this player operates in a more central capacity.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
18
Minutes
1257
Goals
4
Assists
1
Key passes
13
Rating
6.99
Tackles
18
Shots on target
9
Successful dribbles
9
Clean sheets
7
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 69.3Form 69.1
Previous
TQ 70.0Form 69.8
Current
TQ 61.5Form 61.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.29
Assists
0.07
Key Passes
0.93
Tackles
1.29
Rating
6.99
Jorge Resurrección Merodio

A near-exact FQ Score match (49.14) suggests similar production ceilings; Resurrección Merodio has historically offered more direct goal threat from midfield, making him a slightly more attack-oriented variant of this profile.

Compare →
Sean Longstaff

The closest FQ Score of the three (49.81) and a fellow central midfielder, making him the most structurally comparable; Longstaff operates in the Premier League, a higher-difficulty environment, which may contextually flatter his score relative to Serie A.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Defensive activity
18 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking creation

0.88 key passes and 0.07 assists per 90 are below what is typically expected from a central midfielder asked to contribute in the final third. The 0.29 goals per 90 provides some forward presence but is insufficient to compensate for limited chance creation.

Defensive output

1.32 tackles per 90 is a modest return for a central midfielder, where higher defensive action volumes are generally expected to justify a starting role. Without interception or duel data, the full picture is incomplete, but this figure alone does not suggest a defensive specialist profile.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →