TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Koke 

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Atlético Madrid
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jan 8, 1992 (34)
Jersey Number
#6
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Koke 
Koke 
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Atlético Madrid
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jan 8, 1992 (34)
Jersey Number
#6
TactiQ Score
68.6
89% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
68.6
Form Score
63.9
Confidence
89%
Role
central_midfielder
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.09
Assists
0.09
Key Pass
1.43
Tackles
2.22
Rating
7.00
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A La Liga central midfielder sitting at 49.14 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer tier and below the baseline expected of regular starters at this level. Across 29 matches and 1,843 minutes this season, output is modest: 0.10 goals per 90, 0.10 assists per 90, and a 6.99 average rating. The most notable on-ball contribution is 1.42 key passes per 90, while 2.15 tackles per 90 suggests some defensive engagement, but neither figure is enough to distinguish this player within the position.

Why this score

The FQ score of 49.14 is driven by a composite picture of below-baseline production with no dimensional sub-score standing above the threshold — all role-specific dimensions (creation, progression, defense) returned null, meaning no single area of the game provides a meaningful upward pull on the overall rating. The score confidence of 0.85 confirms this is a reliable signal, not a thin-sample artefact.

Form Trajectory

Form score (49.21) and FQ score (49.14) are separated by just 0.07 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no upward or downward trajectory signal; this is a player performing at a consistent, flat level across both recent and multi-season windows.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Emanuele Giaccherini

Nearly identical FQ score (49.15) reflects a comparable tier of central midfield contribution; Giaccherini was historically more box-to-box in profile, whereas this player's 2.15 tackles per 90 suggests a slightly more defensive orientation.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
1950
Goals
2
Assists
2
Key passes
31
Rating
7.00
Tackles
48
Shots on target
4
Successful dribbles
5
Clean sheets
13
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 67.1Form 66.8
Previous
TQ 64.2Form 64.0
Current
TQ 64.2Form 63.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.09
Assists
0.09
Key Passes
1.43
Tackles
2.22
Rating
7.00
Sean Longstaff

Longstaff's FQ score of 49.81 places him in the same typical-performer band; both players occupy a similar positional role, though Longstaff operates in the Premier League, making his score in a higher-difficulty environment a marginal contextual differentiator.

Compare →
Unai López Cabrera

Unai López Cabrera scores 50.58 — fractionally above this player — and shares the central midfielder profile in Spanish football, making him the closest like-for-like comparison; the small gap suggests broadly equivalent output levels within the same league context.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
1950 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
48 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
13 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Chance creation

1.42 key passes per 90 is the standout per-90 figure, but for a central midfielder in La Liga — a league that demands consistent creative output — this sits in the middle range and does not compensate for the absence of any measurable creation sub-score above baseline.

Goal and assist contribution

0.10 goals per 90 and 0.10 assists per 90 across 1,843 minutes represent low direct output for a central midfielder, where even defensively-oriented profiles are typically expected to contribute more in transition.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →