Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A central midfielder in La Liga sitting at 50.58 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band, with no sub-score dimension breaking above the baseline. Across 24 matches and 1,404 minutes this season, the player is contributing 1.86 key passes and 1.79 tackles per 90, which points to a broadly functional but undifferentiated profile. There is no standout dimension to lead with: all role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, finishing) are null, capping how precisely this player can be evaluated.
The FQ score of 50.58 is anchored by a mid-range output profile with no sub-score evidence of above-average contribution in any dimension. The absence of creation, progression, and defensive sub-scores — all critical for a central midfielder — means the score reflects a floor-level read rather than a full picture, and the available per-90 numbers (1.86 key passes, 1.79 tackles, 0.19 assists) do not suggest any single area of meaningful overperformance.
The form score of 52.76 sits 2.18 points above the FQ score of 50.58, placing this player in stable territory — no meaningful upward or downward trend is indicated. The delta falls well within the ±5 threshold, suggesting recent performances are consistent with the season-long baseline rather than signalling a directional shift.
Bellegarde's FQ score of 51.33 places him at a near-identical overall level; the key difference is Bellegarde operates in a higher-pressing system that generates more defensive action data, giving his profile greater sub-score definition.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Longstaff's FQ score of 49.81 reflects a similarly functional but undifferentiated central midfield profile; Longstaff's data typically shows stronger defensive sub-score coverage, whereas this player's defensive dimension remains unscored.
Mkhitaryan's FQ score of 51.78 is the closest ceiling in this comparable set; Mkhitaryan's profile is historically creation-weighted, which would represent a meaningful positional distinction if this player's creation sub-score were available to compare.
0.19 assists per 90 is modest for a central midfielder, and with the creation sub-score unavailable, there is no evidence of underlying chance-creation volume compensating for the low assist rate.
The progression sub-score is null and no progressive action metrics are present in the data, making it impossible to confirm whether this player drives play forward — a core expectation for the role.
1.79 tackles per 90 is a surface-level signal, but the defense sub-score is null, preventing any assessment of defensive reliability or positioning — a meaningful gap for a central midfielder evaluation.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →