TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Henrikh Mkhitaryan

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Inter
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jan 21, 1989 (37)
Jersey Number
#22
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Henrikh Mkhitaryan
Henrikh Mkhitaryan
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Inter
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Jan 21, 1989 (37)
Jersey Number
#22
TactiQ Score
69.6
83% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
69.6
Form Score
64.5
Confidence
83%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.25
Assists
0.06
Key Pass
1.20
Tackles
2.02
Rating
6.94
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A central midfielder in Serie A sitting at 51.78 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical-performer band. The most distinctive data point is what's absent: all role-defining sub-scores (creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning this profile is built entirely on surface-level per-90 output. At 1.3 key passes and 1.98 tackles per 90 with a 6.92 average rating, this is a player meeting minimum positional requirements without evidence of standout contribution in any dimension.

Why this score

The FQ score of 51.78 is driven by baseline-adequate per-90 numbers — 0.14 goals, 0.07 assists, 1.3 key passes — none of which clear the bar for above-average production in a central midfielder role. The complete absence of dimensional sub-scores means no single strength can be identified to push the score higher.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 48.42 sits 3.4 points below the FQ score of 51.78 — within the ±5 stable range but trending softly downward. Not an alarm signal, but recent output is running slightly behind the season baseline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Jean-Ricner Bellegarde

Comparable FQ score (51.33) places Bellegarde in the same typical-performer band; the key difference is Bellegarde's profile has more defined dimensional data to work with, whereas this player's null sub-scores make direct comparison limited.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
28
Minutes
1428
Goals
4
Assists
1
Key passes
19
Rating
6.94
Tackles
32
Shots on target
11
Successful dribbles
13
Clean sheets
15
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 72.5Form 72.1
Previous
TQ 67.1Form 66.9
Current
TQ 64.6Form 64.5
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.25
Assists
0.06
Key Passes
1.20
Tackles
2.02
Rating
6.94
Daniel Parejo Muñoz

Parejo's 52.26 FQ score sits just above this player's 51.78, reflecting similarly modest overall output; Parejo is historically a higher-volume creator, which would likely separate them if creation sub-scores were available.

Compare →
Unai López Cabrera

López Cabrera's 50.58 FQ score is the closest match numerically, suggesting near-identical overall production tiers; both sit in the adequate-starter range without evidence of a defining elite dimension.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
32 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
15 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Creative output

1.3 key passes per 90 is the only creation proxy available, and with the creation sub-score null, there is no evidence this player is influencing the game above a baseline level for a Serie A central midfielder.

Goal and assist contribution

0.14 goals and 0.07 assists per 90 across 1,315 minutes represent low direct output for a central midfielder — combined that is roughly one goal involvement every five matches.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →