Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level central midfielder in Serie A sitting at an FQ Score of 49.15 — squarely in the typical performer band and below the adequate-starter threshold. Across 26 matches and 2,008 minutes this season, no dimension stands out: key passes of 2.02 per 90 and 0.13 goals per 90 represent mid-table midfield output with no compensating elite quality identifiable in the data.
The FQ Score of 49.15 is driven primarily by the absence of above-baseline production in any measurable midfield dimension — creation, progression, defense, and finishing sub-scores are all unavailable, and the per-90 numbers (0.04 assists, 0.36 tackles) do not signal a standout contribution in any single area. The score confidence of 0.84 over a 91% complete dataset means this reading is reliable, not a thin-sample artefact.
Form score of 49.43 sits just 0.28 points above the FQ Score of 49.15 — a delta well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; performance has been flat and consistent across the season.
Nearly identical FQ Score (49.14 vs 49.15) places them at the same overall performance level; the key distinction is league and tactical context, which may account for subtle differences in how their output is generated.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Longstaff's FQ Score of 49.81 is marginally higher, suggesting a comparable output ceiling, though Longstaff operates in a different league environment which may shape his defensive and progressive contributions differently.
López Cabrera's 50.58 FQ Score sits just above the adequate-starter threshold, making him the slight ceiling reference in this peer group — the gap of roughly 1.4 points reflects a similarly limited but marginally more productive midfield profile.
0.36 tackles per 90 is low for a central midfielder, a role where ball-winning is a baseline expectation. This limits his utility in any press-heavy or defensively demanding system.
0.13 goals and 0.04 assists per 90 place him well below what is typically expected of a box-to-box or advanced central midfielder. Over 2,008 minutes, that translates to roughly 3 goals and 1 assist — minimal attacking return for the position.
2.02 key passes per 90 is the one volume metric with some presence, but without a creation sub-score to contextualise quality and conversion, it cannot be treated as a strength — and the assist rate (0.04 per 90) suggests limited end-product from those opportunities.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →