TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Emanuele Giaccherini

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
ChievoVerona
Position
Central Midfielder
Also: Midfielder
Date of Birth
May 5, 1985 (41)
Jersey Number
Unknown
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Emanuele Giaccherini
Emanuele Giaccherini
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
ChievoVerona
Position
Central Midfielder
Also: Midfielder
Date of Birth
May 5, 1985 (41)
Jersey Number
Unknown
TactiQ Score
64.3
80% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
64.3
Form Score
64.0
Confidence
80%
Role
central_midfielder
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.13
Assists
0.04
Key Pass
2.02
Tackles
0.36
Rating
7.01
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level central midfielder in Serie A sitting at an FQ Score of 49.15 — squarely in the typical performer band and below the adequate-starter threshold. Across 26 matches and 2,008 minutes this season, no dimension stands out: key passes of 2.02 per 90 and 0.13 goals per 90 represent mid-table midfield output with no compensating elite quality identifiable in the data.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 49.15 is driven primarily by the absence of above-baseline production in any measurable midfield dimension — creation, progression, defense, and finishing sub-scores are all unavailable, and the per-90 numbers (0.04 assists, 0.36 tackles) do not signal a standout contribution in any single area. The score confidence of 0.84 over a 91% complete dataset means this reading is reliable, not a thin-sample artefact.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 49.43 sits just 0.28 points above the FQ Score of 49.15 — a delta well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; performance has been flat and consistent across the season.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Jorge Resurrección Merodio

Nearly identical FQ Score (49.14 vs 49.15) places them at the same overall performance level; the key distinction is league and tactical context, which may account for subtle differences in how their output is generated.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
26
Minutes
2008
Goals
3
Assists
1
Key passes
45
Rating
7.01
Tackles
8
Shots on target
12
Successful dribbles
26
Clean sheets
3
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 70.4Form 70.2
Previous
TQ 61.2Form 61.4
Current
TQ 64.3Form 64.0
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.13
Assists
0.04
Key Passes
2.02
Tackles
0.36
Rating
7.01
Sean Longstaff

Longstaff's FQ Score of 49.81 is marginally higher, suggesting a comparable output ceiling, though Longstaff operates in a different league environment which may shape his defensive and progressive contributions differently.

Compare →
Unai López Cabrera

López Cabrera's 50.58 FQ Score sits just above the adequate-starter threshold, making him the slight ceiling reference in this peer group — the gap of roughly 1.4 points reflects a similarly limited but marginally more productive midfield profile.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2008 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive contribution

0.36 tackles per 90 is low for a central midfielder, a role where ball-winning is a baseline expectation. This limits his utility in any press-heavy or defensively demanding system.

Goal and assist output

0.13 goals and 0.04 assists per 90 place him well below what is typically expected of a box-to-box or advanced central midfielder. Over 2,008 minutes, that translates to roughly 3 goals and 1 assist — minimal attacking return for the position.

Creation

2.02 key passes per 90 is the one volume metric with some presence, but without a creation sub-score to contextualise quality and conversion, it cannot be treated as a strength — and the assist rate (0.04 per 90) suggests limited end-product from those opportunities.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →