Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 center back sitting at 51.32 on the FQ scale — a typical performer range indicating no standout quality in either direction. Across 27 matches and 2,368 minutes this season, the most notable on-ball contribution is a modest 0.42 key passes per 90, while goal involvement is minimal at 0.04 goals and 0.11 assists per 90. With all role-specific sub-scores unavailable, the picture is shaped primarily by aggregate output rather than granular defensive profiling.
The FQ score of 51.32 reflects a player meeting the bare minimum positional baseline without clear strengths to elevate the rating. The absence of any sub-score data — finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, and physical duels are all null — means the score is driven entirely by aggregate per-90 output, which is thin for a center back role where defensive actions are the primary value driver.
Form is stable with a marginal downward drift — the form score of 49.33 sits 1.99 points below the FQ score of 51.32, which is within the ±5 stable range and does not signal meaningful concern. No acute deterioration, but no recovery signal either.
Closely matched at an FQ score of 50.48, both operating as typical starters without standout contributions; Diks profiles as a more attacking fullback type, whereas this player is a pure center back.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Near-identical FQ score of 50.11 reflects a similar level of aggregate output and positional baseline; Dźwigała's scoring context may differ by league difficulty, which cannot be fully benchmarked here given null sub-scores.
FQ score of 50.04 places Kolašinac at the same typical-performer tier; Kolašinac brings a more physically imposing profile with known aerial and duel metrics, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied for this player given missing sub-score data.
With 1.25 tackles per 90 as the only available defensive metric and all defensive sub-scores null, there is no evidence of above-baseline defensive contribution — a critical gap for a center back whose primary value should come from duels, interceptions, and clearances.
0.04 goals and 0.11 assists per 90 represent minimal output even by center back standards, where set-piece threat and occasional progressive carries are expected contributions at a competitive Ligue 1 level.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →