TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Brendan Chardonnet

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Brest
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 22, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#5
League
Ligue 1
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Brendan Chardonnet
Brendan Chardonnet
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Brest
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 22, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#5
TactiQ Score
74.6
93% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.6
Form Score
69.4
Confidence
93%
Role
center_back
League
Ligue 1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.11
Key Pass
0.44
Tackles
1.21
Rating
7.01
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Ligue 1 center back sitting at 51.32 on the FQ scale — a typical performer range indicating no standout quality in either direction. Across 27 matches and 2,368 minutes this season, the most notable on-ball contribution is a modest 0.42 key passes per 90, while goal involvement is minimal at 0.04 goals and 0.11 assists per 90. With all role-specific sub-scores unavailable, the picture is shaped primarily by aggregate output rather than granular defensive profiling.

Why this score

The FQ score of 51.32 reflects a player meeting the bare minimum positional baseline without clear strengths to elevate the rating. The absence of any sub-score data — finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, and physical duels are all null — means the score is driven entirely by aggregate per-90 output, which is thin for a center back role where defensive actions are the primary value driver.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable with a marginal downward drift — the form score of 49.33 sits 1.99 points below the FQ score of 51.32, which is within the ±5 stable range and does not signal meaningful concern. No acute deterioration, but no recovery signal either.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Kevin Diks

Closely matched at an FQ score of 50.48, both operating as typical starters without standout contributions; Diks profiles as a more attacking fullback type, whereas this player is a pure center back.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
28
Minutes
2458
Goals
1
Assists
3
Key passes
12
Rating
7.01
Tackles
33
Shots on target
6
Successful dribbles
1
Clean sheets
9
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 75.7Form 76.1
Previous
TQ 70.9Form 71.1
Current
TQ 69.1Form 69.4
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
0.11
Key Passes
0.44
Tackles
1.21
Rating
7.01
Adam Dźwigała

Near-identical FQ score of 50.11 reflects a similar level of aggregate output and positional baseline; Dźwigała's scoring context may differ by league difficulty, which cannot be fully benchmarked here given null sub-scores.

Compare →
Sead Kolašinac

FQ score of 50.04 places Kolašinac at the same typical-performer tier; Kolašinac brings a more physically imposing profile with known aerial and duel metrics, a dimension that cannot be confirmed or denied for this player given missing sub-score data.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2458 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
33 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

With 1.25 tackles per 90 as the only available defensive metric and all defensive sub-scores null, there is no evidence of above-baseline defensive contribution — a critical gap for a center back whose primary value should come from duels, interceptions, and clearances.

Attacking involvement

0.04 goals and 0.11 assists per 90 represent minimal output even by center back standards, where set-piece threat and occasional progressive carries are expected contributions at a competitive Ligue 1 level.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →