Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center back sitting at 51.94 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with 34 appearances and 2,956 minutes this season confirming a regular starter role. The most distinctive feature here is the absence of any sub-score data: finishing, creation, progression, defense, and physical duel scores are all null, meaning the headline number is built on limited dimensional evidence. At 6.81 average match rating and 1.89 tackles per 90, this is a player meeting baseline expectations without standing out in any measurable direction.
The FQ score of 51.94 reflects a mid-table defensive profile with no sub-score dimension pulling the number meaningfully higher. With all five positional sub-scores null, the score leans heavily on surface-level output metrics — 1.89 tackles per 90 and 0.09 key passes per 90 — which are modest but not alarming for the role.
Form score of 52.02 sits just 0.08 above the FQ score of 51.94 — a delta of +0.1, well within the ±5 stable band. There is no upward or downward momentum to report; this player is performing at exactly their established level.
Romero's FQ score of 53.00 places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close overall match; however, Romero carries more sub-score data that allows for dimensional comparison this player currently lacks.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Diks scores 50.48, nearly identical in overall output level, suggesting a similar baseline contribution profile; the key difference is positional versatility, as Diks operates across the defensive line rather than as a fixed center back.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score reflects a comparable floor of defensive contribution; like this player, he sits in the adequate-starter tier without evidence of elite output in any single dimension.
1.89 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive metric, and with the defense sub-score null, there is no granular data on interceptions, duels won, or aerial success. For a center back in Serie A, this limits confidence in assessing whether defensive contributions are role-adequate or below baseline.
0.09 key passes per 90 is minimal for a modern center back, and both the creation and progression sub-scores are null. In a league that increasingly demands ball-playing ability from defenders, this gap in measurable output is a meaningful flag.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →