Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center-back sitting at 49.22 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range and below the baseline expected of a consistent starter in this role. Across 31 matches and 2,656 minutes this season, his per-90 output is modest: 1.49 tackles, 0.30 key passes, and a 6.94 average rating. The most distinctive feature of this profile is not a strength but a data gap — all role-specific sub-scores are null, meaning the defensive dimensions that define a center-back's value cannot be directly measured here.
The FQ Score of 49.22 is driven primarily by below-baseline production signals from the performance agent (scored 44), which flags low or inconsistent defensive action volumes relative to positional expectations. The absence of a defense sub-score is the single biggest analytical limitation — for a center-back, that dimension is the primary value driver, and its absence leaves the score anchored to thin surface metrics.
Form is stable-to-marginally improving: the form score of 53.93 sits 4.71 points above the FQ score of 49.22, just below the +5 threshold for a confirmed upward trend. This is consistent with a player performing slightly better in recent matches than his season-long baseline, but the gap is not large enough to signal a meaningful breakout.
Nearly identical FQ score (49.62 vs 49.22) places them at the same typical-performer tier; Alderete edges ahead marginally in overall rating.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Cabrera Sasía scores 48.49, fractionally below this player, suggesting a similar production profile and role contribution ceiling at this stage.
Kolašinac's 50.04 FQ score is the closest ceiling in this comparable set; his profile likely differs in positional versatility given his background as a left-sided defender rather than a pure center-back.
1.49 tackles per 90 is the only visible defensive metric, and without interception, duel, or aerial data — all sub-scores are null — it is impossible to confirm whether this represents adequate or below-average defensive contribution for a Serie A center-back. The performance agent explicitly flags this as a core gap.
0.03 goals and 0.03 assists per 90, with 0.30 key passes per 90, places this player at the very low end of what is expected even from a defensively-oriented center-back in a modern system. Progression sub-score is also null, so ball-carrying and passing range cannot be assessed.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →