Ezri Konsa
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.
A fringe-level center-back in the Premier League with an FQ Score of 51.26 — sitting in the typical performer band and below the baseline expected of a regular starter at this level. Across 32 matches and 2,859 minutes this season, the available output metrics are thin: 0.66 tackles per 90 and a 6.83 average match rating offer limited evidence of meaningful defensive contribution. The absence of any sub-score data — including a defense score, which is the core metric for this role — makes a full picture impossible, but what is available does not suggest above-baseline performance.
The FQ Score of 51.26 is driven primarily by below-baseline positional output with no sub-score — including the critical defense sub-score — registering a value. Without tackles won rates, aerial duel percentages, or clearance volumes, the scoring system cannot reward role-specific defensive production, and the raw available metrics (0.66 tackles/90, 6.83 rating) do not compensate for those gaps.
Form is stable with a marginal soft decline: the form score of 48.18 sits 3.08 points below the FQ Score of 51.26, which falls within the ±5 stable range but trends slightly downward. No volatility signal is present — this reads as a consistently modest performer rather than a player in active decline.
Diks carries a near-identical FQ Score of 50.48, placing him in the same typical performer band; the key difference is positional — Diks operates as a fullback, meaning his comparable score reflects a different defensive and attacking contribution profile.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.