Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Ligue 1 center back sitting at 51.09 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — with 2,571 minutes across 29 matches this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what is absent: all role-defining sub-scores (defense, progression, physical duel) are null, meaning the score is built on surface-level data rather than granular positional output. With a match rating of 6.82 and just 1.37 tackles per 90, there is limited evidence of standout defensive contribution.
The FQ score of 51.09 reflects a below-average center back profile with no sub-score dimension clearing the 70 threshold. The absence of a defensive sub-score — the primary evaluative dimension for this role — means the score is anchored by general presence and volume rather than demonstrated defensive quality.
Form score of 48.96 sits 2.1 points below the FQ score of 51.09 — within the ±5 stable range, but on the softer side. Trajectory is effectively flat with a mild downward lean; no meaningful acceleration or deterioration is evident.
Diks scores 50.48, nearly identical to this player's 51.09, reflecting a similar profile of adequate starter-level output; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a center back, giving his score a different positional context.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score places him in the same typical performer band; like this player, he represents consistent but unremarkable defensive presence without elite sub-score markers.
Kolašinac at 50.04 is the closest in score and shares a defensive role profile; his career trajectory as an experienced defender provides a useful ceiling reference for what this band of center back looks like at its upper end.
1.37 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive volume indicator, and no defensive sub-score exists to contextualize it. For a center back, this is the critical gap — duels won, interceptions, and aerial success are all unscored, leaving role-specific quality unverified.
Progression and creation sub-scores are both null, and key passes sit at just 0.07 per 90. Modern center backs are increasingly evaluated on ball-playing ability; there is no data here to suggest this player contributes meaningfully in that dimension.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →