Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level center back in Serie A sitting at an FQ Score of 49.41 — below the typical starter threshold of 60 and in the bottom tier of scored players. Across 17 matches and 1,450 minutes this season, the per-90 output is thin for the role: 1.3 tackles and a 7.03 average rating are the headline defensive markers available, with no granular sub-score data to assess specific defensive dimensions. At this score level, the player is operating as a squad-depth option rather than a reliable starter.
The FQ Score of 49.41 is driven primarily by below-baseline composite defensive output — all sub-scores are null, meaning the score is built entirely on the aggregate signal, which places this player in the below-50 fringe range. The absence of granular defensive metrics (duels won, interceptions, aerial success) limits precision, but the overall composite is consistent across all three specialist agents, who unanimously scored this player between 43 and 58.
Form score of 45.42 sits 3.99 points below the FQ Score of 49.41 — within the ±5 stable range, but trending in the wrong direction. This is a soft, modest decline rather than a meaningful concern, though for a player already below the starter threshold, any downward drift is worth monitoring.
Nearly identical FQ Score (49.62 vs 49.41), placing both players in the same fringe-starter band; Alderete Fernández edges ahead marginally on the composite signal.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable overall score (50.04) suggests similar output levels, though Kolašinac's profile as a converted left back means his defensive positioning context differs from a natural center back.
Closest FQ Score of the three comparables at 50.11, indicating near-equivalent composite performance; both sit just above the 50-mark with limited separation from fringe status.
1.3 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive action rate, and for a center back in Serie A — a physically demanding, tactically intense league — this figure is low. Combined with a below-50 FQ Score, it points to inconsistent or low-volume defensive production in core CB responsibilities.
All six sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense, possession control, physical duel) are null. While data confidence sits at 0.72 — just above the thin-evidence threshold — the absence of dimensional breakdowns means this evaluation rests entirely on the composite signal, reducing analytical precision.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →