TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Aleix Febas

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Elche
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Feb 2, 1996 (30)
Jersey Number
#14
League
La Liga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Aleix Febas
Aleix Febas
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Elche
Position
Central Midfield
Also: Central Midfielder
Date of Birth
Feb 2, 1996 (30)
Jersey Number
#14
TactiQ Score
67.6
97% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
67.6
Form Score
66.3
Confidence
97%
Role
central_midfielder
League
La Liga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
0.09
Key Pass
0.81
Tackles
2.23
Rating
7.05
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A functional La Liga central midfielder sitting at 50.22 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band, with no sub-score data pointing to a standout dimension in either direction. Across 32 matches and 2,835 minutes this season, the profile is defined by consistency of presence rather than quality of output. The 7.07 average rating and 0.79 key passes per 90 suggest a serviceable contributor, but nothing in the data separates this player from the positional median.

Why this score

The FQ score of 50.22 reflects a player who meets the baseline for a central midfielder without exceeding it in any measurable way. All role-specific sub-scores (creation, progression, defense, finishing) are null, meaning the score is driven by surface-level output metrics — 0.06 goals per 90, 0.10 assists per 90, and 2.22 tackles per 90 — none of which are notably above or below positional norms.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 55.21 sits 4.99 points above the FQ score of 50.22 — right at the threshold of an upward signal, indicating a stable-to-slightly-improving trajectory rather than a clear breakout. The gap is not large enough to confirm a sustained shift in output quality, but there are no signs of decline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Unai López Cabrera

Nearly identical FQ score (50.58 vs 50.22), both profiling as functional central midfielders without a dominant sub-score; López Cabrera edges slightly higher on the overall scale.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
34
Minutes
2992
Goals
2
Assists
3
Key passes
27
Rating
7.05
Tackles
74
Shots on target
8
Successful dribbles
49
Clean sheets
7
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 64.4Form 64.3
Previous
TQ 57.7Form 57.8
Current
TQ 66.6Form 66.3
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
0.09
Key Passes
0.81
Tackles
2.23
Rating
7.05
Sean Longstaff

Comparable overall rating (49.81) reflecting a similar median-tier central midfield profile, though Longstaff operates in the Premier League, representing a different competitive context.

Compare →
Emanuele Giaccherini

Closest in FQ score (49.15) among the comparables, sharing the typical-performer band; Giaccherini's profile historically skewed more to wide roles, making this a positional rather than stylistic match.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2992 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
74 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking output

0.06 goals and 0.10 assists per 90 are low for a central midfielder expected to contribute in the final third. Combined, that is 0.16 goal involvements per 90 — thin for a player logging 2,835 minutes.

Chance creation

0.79 key passes per 90 sits around the middle of the range for this role. Without a creation sub-score to contextualise quality, this volume alone does not indicate meaningful creative influence.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →