TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

David Raum

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
RB Leipzig
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Apr 22, 1998 (28)
Jersey Number
#22
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
David Raum
David Raum
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
RB Leipzig
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Apr 22, 1998 (28)
Jersey Number
#22
TactiQ Score
76.2
95% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
76.2
Form Score
75.3
Confidence
95%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.11
Assists
0.25
Key Pass
3.45
Tackles
1.76
Rating
7.44
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Bundesliga fullback/wingback sitting at 63.21 on the FQ scale — an adequate starter with no standout dimension separating them from the positional baseline. The most distinctive data point is 3.44 key passes per 90, which is notably high for a fullback role and suggests an offensive-leaning profile. At 0.11 goals and 0.22 assists per 90 across 2,487 minutes, end-product output is modest but consistent.

Why this score

With all role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) returning null, the FQ score of 63.21 is driven primarily by aggregate per-90 output and positional baseline calibration rather than any identified elite dimension. The absence of granular component scores means no single strength is pulling the score upward — this is a profile built on steady, unremarkable volume.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 63.95 sits just 0.74 points above the FQ score of 63.21 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing at exactly their established level.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Maximilian Mittelstädt

The closest FQ match at 64.86, both operating as Bundesliga fullbacks in the adequate-starter band; Mittelstädt edges ahead marginally, suggesting slightly more consistent role-specific output.

Compare →
Achraf Hakimi Mouh
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
30
Minutes
2556
Goals
3
Assists
7
Key passes
98
Rating
7.44
Tackles
50
Shots on target
8
Successful dribbles
16
Clean sheets
11
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 74.2Form 73.3
Previous
TQ 70.0Form 68.9
Current
TQ 76.5Form 75.2
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.11
Assists
0.25
Key Passes
3.45
Tackles
1.76
Rating
7.44

Both profile as attack-oriented fullbacks with creative intent, but Hakimi's FQ of 56.05 is notably lower here, reflecting a period of reduced output rather than a ceiling comparison.

Compare →
Lucas Digne

Digne's FQ of 54.21 sits below this player's 63.21, making him a lower-output comparable; the similarity lies in the left-sided, delivery-focused fullback profile rather than overall level.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2556 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.44 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
10 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Attacking end-product

Despite 3.44 key passes per 90 — high for a fullback — the conversion into direct output is limited at 0.22 assists and 0.11 goals per 90 over 29 matches, suggesting chance creation that does not consistently translate into recorded contributions.

Defensive measurability

The defense sub-score is null and only 1.81 tackles per 90 is available as a proxy. For a fullback/wingback, the inability to assess defensive output quantitatively is a meaningful gap — it is unclear whether this player fulfils the defensive half of the dual role adequately.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →