TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Maximilian Mittelstädt

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
VfB Stuttgart
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Mar 18, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#7
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Maximilian Mittelstädt
Maximilian Mittelstädt
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
VfB Stuttgart
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Mar 18, 1997 (29)
Jersey Number
#7
TactiQ Score
77.5
91% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
77.5
Form Score
71.9
Confidence
91%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.26
Assists
0.17
Key Pass
1.53
Tackles
2.85
Rating
7.29
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Bundesliga fullback/wingback sitting at 64.86 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory, meeting positional expectations without standing out in any single dimension. The most distinctive data point is the per-90 output: 2.87 tackles, 1.53 key passes, and 0.22 goals per 90 paint a picture of a two-way contributor, though no sub-scores are available to confirm where the ceiling lies. With 2,004 minutes across 29 matches, the sample is substantial and the 0.87 confidence rating makes this one of the more reliable reads at this score level.

Why this score

The FQ score of 64.86 reflects consistent, baseline-meeting output without a breakout dimension to push it higher — all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning the composite is driven entirely by aggregated per-90 metrics rather than role-specific depth. The 2.87 tackles per 90 and 1.53 key passes per 90 suggest a functional two-way fullback, but neither figure is dominant enough to lift the score into the 70+ range.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 62.81 sits 2.05 points below the FQ score of 64.86 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful decline but a slight softening in recent output. Trajectory is stable with a mild downward lean; not a concern at current magnitude.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
David Raum

Raum's FQ score of 63.21 is nearly identical, making him the closest structural peer; the key difference is Raum's profile is more established as an attacking-leaning wingback, whereas this player's role emphasis remains unconfirmed due to null sub-scores.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
31
Minutes
2117
Goals
6
Assists
4
Key passes
36
Rating
7.29
Tackles
67
Shots on target
16
Successful dribbles
15
Clean sheets
10
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 75.9Form 74.1
Previous
TQ 74.7Form 74.4
Current
TQ 72.2Form 71.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.26
Assists
0.17
Key Passes
1.53
Tackles
2.85
Rating
7.29
Alejandro Grimaldo García

Grimaldo's 67.56 FQ score sits just above, reflecting a similar fullback/wingback archetype in a comparable competitive context; Grimaldo's higher score suggests a more defined attacking output that this player has not yet matched.

Compare →
Julian Ryerson

Ryerson's 58.64 FQ score is the floor of this comparison group, useful as a baseline for what a below-average output looks like at this position; this player's 64.86 represents a clear step above Ryerson's contribution level.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2117 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.29 in the current season snapshot.
Direct output
10 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Sub-score depth

All role-specific sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) return null, meaning no single dimension can be confirmed as a strength. For a fullback/wingback, the absence of a defensive or progression breakout is a meaningful gap — it prevents identifying whether this player's value is primarily defensive or attacking.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →