TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Julian Ryerson

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Borussia Dortmund
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Nov 17, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#26
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Julian Ryerson
Julian Ryerson
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Borussia Dortmund
Position
Right Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Nov 17, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#26
TactiQ Score
70.8
91% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.8
Form Score
70.9
Confidence
91%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.62
Key Pass
2.22
Tackles
1.44
Rating
7.01
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated Apr 30, 2026

A Bundesliga fullback/wingback sitting at 58.64 on the FQ scale — adequate starter territory with clear gaps, but not a player who stands out in any single dimension. Across 28 matches and 2,011 minutes this season, the most visible output is a key pass rate of 2.24 per 90, which is above typical for the role, paired with 0.63 assists per 90. The overall profile is functional rather than distinctive.

Why this score

With all role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, creation, finishing) returning null, the FQ score of 58.64 is driven primarily by aggregate output metrics and consistency of participation rather than any standout dimensional strength. The absence of granular sub-score data means no single area elevates the rating above the mid-50s baseline.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 63.74 sits 5.1 points above the FQ score of 58.64, placing this player on an upward trajectory by the minimum threshold. The improvement is real but modest — recent output is trending above the multi-season baseline, though the lack of sub-score data means it is unclear which dimension is driving the uptick.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Achraf Hakimi Mouh

Both profile as attacking-minded fullback/wingbacks with similar FQ scores in the mid-to-upper 50s (Hakimi at 56.05 vs 58.64 here), though Hakimi's profile is built in a higher-profile league context which likely suppresses his score relative to raw output.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
30
Minutes
2185
Assists
15
Key passes
54
Rating
7.01
Tackles
35
Shots on target
1
Successful dribbles
24
Clean sheets
14
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 63.8Form 63.5
Previous
TQ 67.4Form 67.2
Current
TQ 72.8Form 70.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.62
Key Passes
2.22
Tackles
1.44
Rating
7.01
Lucas Digne

Digne's FQ of 54.21 reflects a comparable tier of fullback contribution, with both players sitting in the adequate-starter band; this player edges Digne on current FQ score and has a more positive form trajectory.

Compare →
David Raum

Raum's FQ of 63.21 in the same Bundesliga context sets a meaningful ceiling — he represents what an above-average output looks like at this position in this league, and the 4.57-point gap highlights where this player needs to close ground.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2185 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Direct output
15 combined goals and assists are showing in live coverage.
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
35 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

The defense sub-score is unavailable, but for a fullback/wingback in the Bundesliga, 1.39 tackles per 90 is the only defensive signal present — insufficient to confirm positional solidity, and the overall FQ of 58.64 suggests no defensive premium is being added.

Dimensional consistency

All four role-specific sub-scores (defense, creation, progression, finishing) are null, meaning no single dimension has been confirmed above the 70 threshold. The 7.01 average match rating is functional but does not indicate standout contribution in any area.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →