Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Premier League fullback/wingback sitting at 54.21 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band, with no sub-score dimension breaking above the surface to distinguish them. The most notable data point is 1.29 key passes per 90, which sits above what many defensive-minded fullbacks produce, hinting at an attacking orientation to the role. With all four component sub-scores returning null, the profile is readable only at the surface level: a consistent, mid-range contributor across 1,747 minutes this season.
The FQ score of 54.21 is driven primarily by aggregate output rather than any standout dimension — all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning the score reflects a blended baseline read across 29 matches. The 0.31 assists per 90 and 1.75 tackles per 90 suggest dual-phase involvement, but neither figure is dominant enough to pull the score meaningfully above the 50-59 typical performer range.
Form score of 53.25 sits just 0.96 points below the FQ score of 54.21 — a delta of -1, well within the ±5 stable band. No meaningful trajectory shift is detectable; this player is performing at exactly their established level with no sign of acceleration or decline.
Comparable FQ scores (53.63 vs 54.21) reflect similar overall output levels for a Premier League fullback/wingback, though Dalot operates in a higher-profile attacking system that may inflate his creative numbers relative to this player.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Trippier's FQ score of 52.87 places him at near-identical overall output, with both players occupying the typical performer band; Trippier's profile skews more heavily toward delivery and set-piece creation, a distinction this player's null sub-scores prevent us from confirming or ruling out.
Hakimi's 56.05 FQ score sits just above this player's 54.21, representing the ceiling of what this profile could reach; Hakimi's attacking output in a high-press system is a key differentiator that pushes him above the typical performer threshold.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →