TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Lucas Digne

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Aston Villa
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Jul 20, 1993 (32)
Jersey Number
#12
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Lucas Digne
Lucas Digne
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Aston Villa
Position
Left Back
Also: Full Back / Wing Back
Date of Birth
Jul 20, 1993 (32)
Jersey Number
#12
TactiQ Score
70.2
86% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
70.2
Form Score
65.6
Confidence
86%
Role
fullback_wingback
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.31
Key Pass
1.29
Tackles
1.75
Rating
6.72
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Premier League fullback/wingback sitting at 54.21 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band, with no sub-score dimension breaking above the surface to distinguish them. The most notable data point is 1.29 key passes per 90, which sits above what many defensive-minded fullbacks produce, hinting at an attacking orientation to the role. With all four component sub-scores returning null, the profile is readable only at the surface level: a consistent, mid-range contributor across 1,747 minutes this season.

Why this score

The FQ score of 54.21 is driven primarily by aggregate output rather than any standout dimension — all sub-scores (finishing, creation, progression, defense) are null, meaning the score reflects a blended baseline read across 29 matches. The 0.31 assists per 90 and 1.75 tackles per 90 suggest dual-phase involvement, but neither figure is dominant enough to pull the score meaningfully above the 50-59 typical performer range.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 53.25 sits just 0.96 points below the FQ score of 54.21 — a delta of -1, well within the ±5 stable band. No meaningful trajectory shift is detectable; this player is performing at exactly their established level with no sign of acceleration or decline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
José Diogo Dalot Teixeira

Comparable FQ scores (53.63 vs 54.21) reflect similar overall output levels for a Premier League fullback/wingback, though Dalot operates in a higher-profile attacking system that may inflate his creative numbers relative to this player.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
30
Minutes
1763
Assists
6
Key passes
26
Rating
6.72
Tackles
35
Shots on target
5
Successful dribbles
4
Clean sheets
8
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 65.9Form 65.6
Previous
TQ 70.6Form 70.3
Current
TQ 65.7Form 65.6
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.31
Key Passes
1.29
Tackles
1.75
Rating
6.72
Kieran Trippier

Trippier's FQ score of 52.87 places him at near-identical overall output, with both players occupying the typical performer band; Trippier's profile skews more heavily toward delivery and set-piece creation, a distinction this player's null sub-scores prevent us from confirming or ruling out.

Compare →
Achraf Hakimi Mouh

Hakimi's 56.05 FQ score sits just above this player's 54.21, representing the ceiling of what this profile could reach; Hakimi's attacking output in a high-press system is a key differentiator that pushes him above the typical performer threshold.

Compare →
Creative involvement
Current snapshot shows meaningful chance supply and final-third contribution.
Defensive activity
35 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
No notable gaps identified for this role.
Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →