TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Patrick Mainka

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Heidenheim
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Nov 6, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#6
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Patrick Mainka
Patrick Mainka
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Heidenheim
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Nov 6, 1994 (31)
Jersey Number
#6
TactiQ Score
77.7
96% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
77.7
Form Score
72.4
Confidence
96%
Role
center_back
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
0.06
Key Pass
0.31
Tackles
1.38
Rating
6.98
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 51.92 on the FQ scale — squarely in typical-performer territory for the position. The most notable data point is the complete absence of sub-scores across all dimensions, including defense, which is the primary currency for evaluating a center-back. What the per-90 numbers do show is modest: 1.35 tackles, 0.32 key passes, and a 6.99 average rating across 31 appearances (2,790 minutes).

Why this score

With all sub-scores null — including the defense sub-score that would normally anchor a center-back's FQ rating — the 51.92 is driven entirely by aggregate output metrics rather than role-specific efficiency. The 1.35 tackles per 90 and 6.99 rating are the primary inputs, and neither clears the bar for above-average defensive contribution at this level.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 47.3 sits 4.6 points below the FQ score of 51.92, placing this player in stable-to-soft-decline territory — just inside the ±5 threshold. The high score confidence of 0.94 across 31 matches means this dip is not noise; it reflects a genuine, if modest, downward drift in recent output.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Cristian Gabriel Romero

Both sit in the 50-54 FQ range for center-backs, reflecting typical-to-adequate output; Romero's score of 53 edges higher, suggesting marginally more consistent defensive contribution.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
33
Minutes
2970
Goals
2
Assists
2
Key passes
10
Rating
6.98
Tackles
45
Shots on target
8
Successful dribbles
5
Clean sheets
1
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 76.1Form 76.7
Previous
TQ 76.0Form 76.5
Current
TQ 71.8Form 72.4
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
0.06
Key Passes
0.31
Tackles
1.38
Rating
6.98
Kevin Diks

Comparable FQ score of 50.48 places Diks in the same typical-performer band; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a center-back, meaning his score is built on different positional demands.

Compare →
Adam Dźwigała

Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score is the closest match in this peer group; both players share a similar output floor, though league context and data completeness may differ.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2970 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
45 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive measurability

The defense sub-score is null — the single most important dimension for a center-back cannot be assessed. Without interception, duel, and aerial data, the core of this player's role-specific value is unquantified, which itself is a meaningful gap in the profile.

Attacking contribution

0.06 goals and 0.06 assists per 90 with 0.32 key passes per 90 represent minimal output in the build-up phase. For a Bundesliga center-back, these figures sit below what is typically expected from a ball-playing profile.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →