Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 51.92 on the FQ scale — squarely in typical-performer territory for the position. The most notable data point is the complete absence of sub-scores across all dimensions, including defense, which is the primary currency for evaluating a center-back. What the per-90 numbers do show is modest: 1.35 tackles, 0.32 key passes, and a 6.99 average rating across 31 appearances (2,790 minutes).
With all sub-scores null — including the defense sub-score that would normally anchor a center-back's FQ rating — the 51.92 is driven entirely by aggregate output metrics rather than role-specific efficiency. The 1.35 tackles per 90 and 6.99 rating are the primary inputs, and neither clears the bar for above-average defensive contribution at this level.
Form score of 47.3 sits 4.6 points below the FQ score of 51.92, placing this player in stable-to-soft-decline territory — just inside the ±5 threshold. The high score confidence of 0.94 across 31 matches means this dip is not noise; it reflects a genuine, if modest, downward drift in recent output.
Both sit in the 50-54 FQ range for center-backs, reflecting typical-to-adequate output; Romero's score of 53 edges higher, suggesting marginally more consistent defensive contribution.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable FQ score of 50.48 places Diks in the same typical-performer band; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a center-back, meaning his score is built on different positional demands.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score is the closest match in this peer group; both players share a similar output floor, though league context and data completeness may differ.
The defense sub-score is null — the single most important dimension for a center-back cannot be assessed. Without interception, duel, and aerial data, the core of this player's role-specific value is unquantified, which itself is a meaningful gap in the profile.
0.06 goals and 0.06 assists per 90 with 0.32 key passes per 90 represent minimal output in the build-up phase. For a Bundesliga center-back, these figures sit below what is typically expected from a ball-playing profile.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →