Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 51.25 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with the most distinctive feature being the near-total absence of sub-score data, making a confident positional verdict impossible. Across 13 matches and 1,170 minutes this season, the available per-90 numbers show 3.15 tackles and a 6.84 average rating, but no defensive sub-score exists to anchor a proper evaluation of a player whose entire value should be measured defensively. Data confidence sits at 0.63, meaning all conclusions here carry meaningful uncertainty.
The FQ score of 51.25 is driven primarily by what is missing rather than what is measured: all role-relevant sub-scores — defense, physical duels, progression — are null, leaving the model with thin evidence and a confidence rating of 0.63. Without a defensive sub-score for a center-back, the system cannot reward or penalise the core contribution that defines this position.
Form is effectively flat: the form score of 50.64 sits just 0.61 points below the FQ score of 51.25, placing this player firmly in the stable band (within ±5). There is no upward momentum, but equally no meaningful decline signal to act on.
Diks scores 50.48 — nearly identical to this player's 51.25 — reflecting a similar profile of mid-table defensive contribution; the key difference is role context, as Diks operates as a fullback rather than a pure center-back.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score places him in the same typical-performer band, making him a close overall match; however, Dźwigała's data profile may carry more sub-score granularity, giving his evaluation a firmer evidential base.
Kolašinac at 50.04 rounds out a tight cluster of comparable scores, all within 1.25 points of each other; Kolašinac's physicality profile historically differs from a conventional center-back, making the similarity more about output level than playing style.
The defense sub-score is null despite this player logging 1,170 minutes as a center-back — the single most important dimension for this role. The 3.15 tackles per 90 is a data point, but without duel success rates, interceptions, or aerial metrics, it cannot be contextualised against positional baselines.
Creation and progression sub-scores are both null, and key passes sit at just 0.38 per 90 — below what modern ball-playing center-backs typically contribute. For a Bundesliga starter, this limits any claim to a secondary carrying or build-up role.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →