Nico Elvedi
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.
A Bundesliga center back sitting at an FQ Score of 51 — squarely in the typical performer band — with no sub-score data available to diagnose where value is or isn't being generated. Across 31 matches and 2,788 minutes this season, the profile is one of steady but unremarkable presence, with a 6.96 average match rating and 1.26 tackles per 90 as the only concrete defensive output on record. The absence of a defense sub-score is the defining limitation here: for a center back, that is the primary lens, and without it the picture remains structurally incomplete.
The FQ Score of 51 is anchored by a below-baseline performance agent read of 46, driven primarily by the absence of a defense sub-score — the single most critical dimension for this role. Without it, the system cannot credit or penalise defensive contributions, leaving the score to reflect a thin signal rather than a full picture.
At a form score of 52.1 versus an FQ Score of 51.0, the delta is just +1.1 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum to report; performance has been consistent at this level across the current sample.
Comparable FQ Score of 50.48 places Diks at a near-identical performance level; the key difference is role context, as Diks typically operates as a fullback rather than a central defender.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.