Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 49.55 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range and below the baseline expected of a regular starter at this level. Across 27 matches (2,386 minutes), the most notable on-ball output is 1.62 tackles per 90, but all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, which limits the depth of this read. The overall picture is one of a fringe-to-adequate defender holding a starting spot without clearly distinguishing himself.
The FQ score of 49.55 is driven primarily by the absence of any sub-score above baseline — and critically, the defense sub-score is null despite this being a center back, meaning the single most important dimension for this role cannot be confirmed. What data exists (0.08 goals per 90, 0.04 assists per 90, 6.81 average rating) does not compensate for the missing defensive picture.
Form score (48.82) sits just 0.73 points below the FQ score of 49.55 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no sign of either recovery or accelerating decline.
Nearly identical FQ score (49.62 vs 49.55), suggesting a similar tier of Bundesliga center back output; the key distinction is whether Alderete's sub-score profile is more complete, which would make his assessment more reliable.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Kolašinac scores marginally higher at 50.04 and brings a more established top-flight profile, but both players occupy the same below-baseline-to-adequate band for their defensive role.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score is the closest ceiling in this comparable set; like this player, he represents a typical performer rather than a clear starter-quality asset at Bundesliga level.
The defense sub-score is null for a center back — the primary role-specific metric covering duels won, interceptions, and aerial success is entirely missing. This is the most significant gap in the dataset and prevents confirmation of any defensive strength.
0.08 goals per 90 and 0.04 assists per 90 are low even by center back standards, and 0.23 key passes per 90 offers minimal creative output from deep. These numbers are not expected to be high for the role, but none offset the missing defensive evidence.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →