TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Hauke Wahl

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
St. Pauli
Position
Centre Back
Also: Defender
Date of Birth
Apr 15, 1994 (32)
Jersey Number
#5
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Hauke Wahl
Hauke Wahl
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
St. Pauli
Position
Centre Back
Also: Defender
Date of Birth
Apr 15, 1994 (32)
Jersey Number
#5
TactiQ Score
72.5
94% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
72.5
Form Score
68.4
Confidence
94%
Role
center_back
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.07
Assists
0.04
Key Pass
0.22
Tackles
1.58
Rating
6.79
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 49.55 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range and below the baseline expected of a regular starter at this level. Across 27 matches (2,386 minutes), the most notable on-ball output is 1.62 tackles per 90, but all role-critical sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, which limits the depth of this read. The overall picture is one of a fringe-to-adequate defender holding a starting spot without clearly distinguishing himself.

Why this score

The FQ score of 49.55 is driven primarily by the absence of any sub-score above baseline — and critically, the defense sub-score is null despite this being a center back, meaning the single most important dimension for this role cannot be confirmed. What data exists (0.08 goals per 90, 0.04 assists per 90, 6.81 average rating) does not compensate for the missing defensive picture.

Form Trajectory

Form score (48.82) sits just 0.73 points below the FQ score of 49.55 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no sign of either recovery or accelerating decline.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Omar Federico Alderete Fernández

Nearly identical FQ score (49.62 vs 49.55), suggesting a similar tier of Bundesliga center back output; the key distinction is whether Alderete's sub-score profile is more complete, which would make his assessment more reliable.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2502
Goals
2
Assists
1
Key passes
6
Rating
6.79
Tackles
44
Shots on target
4
Successful dribbles
2
Clean sheets
5
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 66.3Form 68.9
Previous
TQ 71.4Form 71.9
Current
TQ 67.6Form 68.4
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.07
Assists
0.04
Key Passes
0.22
Tackles
1.58
Rating
6.79
Sead Kolašinac

Kolašinac scores marginally higher at 50.04 and brings a more established top-flight profile, but both players occupy the same below-baseline-to-adequate band for their defensive role.

Compare →
Adam Dźwigała

Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score is the closest ceiling in this comparable set; like this player, he represents a typical performer rather than a clear starter-quality asset at Bundesliga level.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Heavy minute load
2502 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
44 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output visibility

The defense sub-score is null for a center back — the primary role-specific metric covering duels won, interceptions, and aerial success is entirely missing. This is the most significant gap in the dataset and prevents confirmation of any defensive strength.

Attacking contribution

0.08 goals per 90 and 0.04 assists per 90 are low even by center back standards, and 0.23 key passes per 90 offers minimal creative output from deep. These numbers are not expected to be high for the role, but none offset the missing defensive evidence.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →