Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A La Liga center-back sitting at 51.24 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with no sub-score data available to diagnose specific strengths or weaknesses. Across 25 matches (1,976 minutes), the most visible output is 2.05 tackles per 90, with a 6.98 average match rating that reflects steady but unremarkable contribution. The absence of a defense sub-score is the defining limitation of this evaluation.
The FQ score of 51.24 reflects a player performing at or just below the positional baseline for a center-back, but the missing defense sub-score — the primary metric for this role — prevents a precise diagnosis. What data exists (tackles per 90, match rating) points to functional but unexceptional defensive output rather than any standout quality driving the score up or down.
Form score of 55.36 sits 4.1 points above the FQ score of 51.24 — within the ±5 stable range, but nudging toward a modest upward signal. This is not a meaningful trend shift, but it does suggest no current decline.
Comparable FQ score (50.48) places Diks in the same typical-performer band; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a central defender, giving him a different positional profile despite the similar overall rating.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Near-identical FQ score (50.11) reflects a similar level of baseline adequacy; Dźwigała's profile is also that of a center-back, making him the closest like-for-like comparison in this set.
FQ score of 50.04 puts Kolašinac in the same range, though his profile as a physically aggressive left-sided defender differs from a more positionally orthodox center-back role.
The defense sub-score is null despite center-back being this player's primary role. Tackles, interceptions, duels won, and aerial success cannot be evaluated dimensionally — a meaningful gap given that defensive production is the core expectation for this position.
0.05 goals per 90 and 0.23 key passes per 90 are low, but these are secondary metrics for a center-back. They are flagged here only because no other sub-score data is available to provide a fuller picture of overall contribution.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →