TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Min-jae Kim

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
FC Bayern München
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Nov 15, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#3
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Min-jae Kim
Min-jae Kim
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
FC Bayern München
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Nov 15, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#3
TactiQ Score
74.5
81% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.5
Form Score
70.9
Confidence
81%
Role
center_back
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
0.06
Key Pass
0.28
Tackles
1.35
Rating
7.16
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 50.32 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band. The most distinctive feature here is the absence of any sub-score data, which limits granular assessment, though 23 matches and 1,469 minutes provide a reasonable sample. Per-90 output is modest: 1.23 tackles, 0.18 key passes, and a 7.07 average rating suggest a functional but unremarkable defensive presence.

Why this score

With all sub-scores null, the FQ score of 50.32 is driven primarily by aggregate output metrics rather than role-specific defensive breakdowns. The absence of standout contributions in any measurable dimension — tackles per 90 at 1.23 is adequate but not above baseline for a Bundesliga center-back — anchors this player firmly in the mid-50s-and-below range.

Form Trajectory

Form score of 48.66 sits 1.66 points below the FQ score of 50.32 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful upward or downward trend. Performance is consistent at this level rather than showing signs of improvement or deterioration.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Kevin Diks

Nearly identical FQ score (50.48 vs 50.32) places them at the same typical-performer tier; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a pure center-back, giving him a different positional profile despite the scoring overlap.

Compare →
Adam Dźwigała
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

10 metrics surfaced
Appearances
25
Minutes
1605
Goals
1
Assists
1
Key passes
5
Rating
7.16
Tackles
24
Shots on target
3
Successful dribbles
1
Clean sheets
8
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 72.7Form 72.9
Previous
TQ 72.4Form 72.5
Current
TQ 70.6Form 70.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
0.06
Key Passes
0.28
Tackles
1.35
Rating
7.16

A close FQ match at 50.11, reflecting a similar level of functional but unexceptional defensive output; direct comparison is limited by the absence of sub-score detail for both players.

Compare →
Sead Kolašinac

FQ score of 50.04 puts Kolašinac at the same performance band; Kolašinac brings a more established top-league profile and physical duel history that may not be reflected equally in this player's data.

Compare →
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
Defensive activity
24 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

1.23 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive signal, and it sits at an adequate rather than above-baseline level for a center-back in the Bundesliga. All granular defensive sub-scores (duels, aerials, interceptions) are null, so the full picture cannot be confirmed — but nothing in the available data points to a standout defensive contribution.

Attacking contribution

0.06 goals and 0.06 assists per 90, with 0.18 key passes per 90 — all near-zero figures that are expected for the role but confirm no meaningful offensive upside distinguishing this player from a typical center-back.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →