Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center-back sitting at 50.32 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band. The most distinctive feature here is the absence of any sub-score data, which limits granular assessment, though 23 matches and 1,469 minutes provide a reasonable sample. Per-90 output is modest: 1.23 tackles, 0.18 key passes, and a 7.07 average rating suggest a functional but unremarkable defensive presence.
With all sub-scores null, the FQ score of 50.32 is driven primarily by aggregate output metrics rather than role-specific defensive breakdowns. The absence of standout contributions in any measurable dimension — tackles per 90 at 1.23 is adequate but not above baseline for a Bundesliga center-back — anchors this player firmly in the mid-50s-and-below range.
Form score of 48.66 sits 1.66 points below the FQ score of 50.32 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful upward or downward trend. Performance is consistent at this level rather than showing signs of improvement or deterioration.
Nearly identical FQ score (50.48 vs 50.32) places them at the same typical-performer tier; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a pure center-back, giving him a different positional profile despite the scoring overlap.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
A close FQ match at 50.11, reflecting a similar level of functional but unexceptional defensive output; direct comparison is limited by the absence of sub-score detail for both players.
FQ score of 50.04 puts Kolašinac at the same performance band; Kolašinac brings a more established top-league profile and physical duel history that may not be reflected equally in this player's data.
1.23 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive signal, and it sits at an adequate rather than above-baseline level for a center-back in the Bundesliga. All granular defensive sub-scores (duels, aerials, interceptions) are null, so the full picture cannot be confirmed — but nothing in the available data points to a standout defensive contribution.
0.06 goals and 0.06 assists per 90, with 0.18 key passes per 90 — all near-zero figures that are expected for the role but confirm no meaningful offensive upside distinguishing this player from a typical center-back.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →