TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Willi Orbán

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
RB Leipzig
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Nov 3, 1992 (33)
Jersey Number
#4
League
Bundesliga
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Willi Orbán
Willi Orbán
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
RB Leipzig
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Nov 3, 1992 (33)
Jersey Number
#4
TactiQ Score
75.0
96% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
75.0
Form Score
75.4
Confidence
96%
Role
center_back
League
Bundesliga
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.28
Tackles
1.42
Rating
7.20
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 50.84 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range — with 2,680 minutes across 30 matches providing a reliable sample. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what's missing: all sub-scores (defense, progression, finishing, creation) are null, meaning the headline number is built without granular positional metrics, which is a significant transparency gap for a role where defensive output is the primary value driver. The 7.18 average rating and 1.34 tackles per 90 are the clearest performance signals available.

Why this score

The FQ score of 50.84 reflects a below-position-baseline performer, most critically explained by the absence of a defense sub-score — the single most important dimension for a center back. Without duels won, interceptions, or aerial success data, the score cannot credit any defensive production, and the available metrics (1.34 tackles per 90, 0.27 key passes per 90) do not independently support a higher rating.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable with a slight upward lean — the form score of 53.34 sits 2.5 points above the FQ score of 50.84, which falls within the ±5 stable range but nudges toward improving. No meaningful concern about decline, and the 0.93 score confidence makes this trend reliable.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Kevin Diks

Comparable FQ score of 50.48 places him in the same typical performer band; both profiles share limited sub-score granularity, though Diks operates as a fullback rather than a center back.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
32
Minutes
2860
Goals
2
Key passes
9
Rating
7.20
Tackles
45
Shots on target
9
Successful dribbles
7
Clean sheets
11
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 67.6Form 67.5
Previous
TQ 72.0Form 71.7
Current
TQ 75.0Form 75.4
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.06
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.28
Tackles
1.42
Rating
7.20
Adam Dźwigała

Nearly identical FQ score of 50.11 reflects a similar overall output level; Dźwigała's profile similarly sits in the adequate-to-fringe starter range for a defensive role.

Compare →
Sead Kolašinac

FQ score of 50.04 puts Kolašinac in the same tier; a key difference is Kolašinac's established top-league history, which provides more contextual benchmarking than this player's current profile allows.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2860 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Strong current rating
Live rating sits at 7.20 in the current season snapshot.
Defensive activity
45 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
11 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output visibility

All sub-scores including the defense dimension are null. For a center back, this is the core production metric — the absence means the score cannot reflect duels, interceptions, or aerial work, leaving 1.34 tackles per 90 as the only defensive signal and creating a meaningful blind spot in the evaluation.

Attacking contribution

0.03 goals per 90 and 0.27 key passes per 90 are minimal, though low attacking output is broadly expected for a center back. At this FQ score level, even marginal ball-playing or progression contributions would help differentiate — and those sub-scores are also null.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →