Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Bundesliga center back sitting at 48.97 on the FQ scale — below the 50-59 typical performer band — with 2,790 minutes across 31 matches this season. The most distinctive feature here is the absence of any sub-score data, which, combined with a per-90 tackle rate of 1.39 and a match rating of 6.89, paints a picture of a player operating below positional baseline without standout contributions in any measurable dimension. At this score level, this is a fringe-to-typical performer rather than a reliable Bundesliga starter.
With all sub-scores returning null, the FQ score of 48.97 is driven primarily by the per-90 output data: 1.39 tackles and 0.26 key passes per 90 are modest figures for a center back in a top-five league, and the 6.89 average match rating sits below what is typically expected of a consistent starter at this level. The absence of a defense sub-score — the primary production dimension for this role — is the single biggest analytical gap and likely reflects insufficient defensive volume or duel success.
Form score of 48.77 sits just 0.20 points below the FQ score of 48.97 — a delta well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; output has been consistent but consistently below baseline throughout the season.
Both sit in the same 48-50 FQ band as below-baseline center backs with limited sub-score differentiation; Cabrera Sasía's 48.49 is marginally lower, suggesting a near-identical performance ceiling at this tier.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Alderete Fernández scores 49.62 — the closest comparable above this player — and represents the same fringe-starter profile in a top league, though his marginally higher score may reflect slightly better defensive volume data.
Kolašinac at 50.04 is the ceiling of this comparable group and offers a reference point for what a step above this player's current output looks like; the key difference is Kolašinac's positional versatility, which adds marginal value not present here.
1.39 tackles per 90 is the only visible defensive volume metric, and with no defense sub-score available, there is no evidence this player is meeting the positional baseline for a Bundesliga center back. For a role where defensive actions are the primary production dimension, this gap is directly relevant.
0.16 goals per 90 and 0.26 key passes per 90 are low even accounting for the center back role, and creation and progression sub-scores are both null — no multi-dimensional upside is visible in the data.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →