TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Joachim Andersen

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Fulham
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
May 31, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#5
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Joachim Andersen
Joachim Andersen
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Fulham
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
May 31, 1996 (29)
Jersey Number
#5
TactiQ Score
72.0
97% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
72.0
Form Score
69.9
Confidence
97%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.03
Key Pass
0.22
Tackles
1.41
Rating
6.88
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level center back in the Premier League sitting at an FQ Score of 48.86 — below the 50th percentile baseline for the position. Across 31 matches (2,745 minutes), this player is producing 1.38 tackles per 90 and a 6.91 average match rating, neither figure suggesting a meaningful defensive presence at this level. The overall picture is one of a player who is not meeting expected production standards for a Premier League center back.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 48.86 places this player in the typical-to-fringe range, and with all positional sub-scores (defense, progression, physical duels) returning null, there is no dimensional standout to offset the weak composite. The 1.38 tackles per 90 is the only concrete defensive volume marker available, and it does not signal above-baseline output for the role.

Form Trajectory

Form is essentially stable — the form score of 50.69 sits just 1.83 points above the FQ Score of 48.86, well within the ±5 range that signals no meaningful directional shift. Note that the underlying data is approximately 2.1 days old, introducing minor recency uncertainty around whether this flat trend has held.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Leandro Daniel Cabrera Sasía

Nearly identical FQ Score (48.49 vs 48.86) places them at the same fringe-starter tier, though Cabrera Sasía's specific sub-score profile is not available for a granular stylistic comparison.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
33
Minutes
2877
Assists
1
Key passes
7
Rating
6.88
Tackles
45
Shots on target
4
Successful dribbles
6
Clean sheets
8
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 69.8Form 69.9
Previous
TQ 67.9Form 70.6
Current
TQ 69.4Form 69.9
Per 90 minutes
Goals
—
Assists
0.03
Key Passes
0.22
Tackles
1.41
Rating
6.88
Omar Federico Alderete Fernández

A close FQ match at 49.62, suggesting similar overall output levels; Alderete Fernández edges marginally higher, hinting at slightly more consistent production.

Compare →
Sead Kolašinac

The highest-rated of the three comparables at 50.04, Kolašinac represents the ceiling of this peer group — a marginal but consistent contributor rather than a clear defensive anchor.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2877 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
45 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
8 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

All defensive sub-scores are null, preventing a full picture, but 1.38 tackles per 90 and a 6.91 match rating across 31 Premier League appearances do not indicate a player meeting the defensive baseline expected of a starting center back at this level.

Attacking contribution

0.03 assists per 90 and 0.23 key passes per 90 are negligible for any role, but particularly so for a center back where ball-playing ability and progressive output are increasingly valued in the Premier League.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →