Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A Serie A center back sitting at 51.13 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — with 26 appearances and 2,017 minutes this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what is absent: all role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score is built on limited dimensional signal. What data exists points to a player operating around the baseline for their position, not above it.
The FQ score of 51.13 is driven primarily by below-baseline output on available metrics — a rating of 6.83 per 90 and 1.65 tackles per 90 are modest for a Serie A center back — compounded by the absence of a defenseScore, which is the primary evaluative dimension for this role. The performance agent scored this player at 45, reflecting that the core defensive picture cannot be fully constructed from the data available.
Form is stable: the form score of 49.9 sits just 1.2 points below the FQ score of 51.13, well within the ±5 threshold. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend — this player is performing consistently with their established baseline, for better or worse.
Diks scores 50.48 — nearly identical to this player's 51.13 — reflecting a similar profile of adequate but unspectacular defensive contribution; the key difference is Diks operates as a fullback, meaning his comparable score comes from a wider, more attack-involved role.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score mirrors the same typical-performer band, and like this player is a center back; the profiles are closely matched in overall output with neither distinguishing themselves above the positional baseline.
Kolašinac at 50.04 rounds out a tight cluster of comparable scores; he brings more physicality and aerial presence as a known quantity, which may represent the ceiling this player has yet to demonstrate given the missing sub-score data.
1.65 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive proxy, and no defenseScore, duel, interception, or clearance sub-score exists to assess core center back contributions. For a player whose entire value proposition is defensive, this is a meaningful analytical gap — and what signal exists does not suggest above-baseline output.
0.27 key passes per 90 and a null progression sub-score indicate minimal contribution in the build-up phase. While creation is not a primary expectation for a center back, progressive passing and carrying are increasingly valued at this level, and there is no evidence of that here.
A per-90 rating of 6.83 sits below what would be expected of a consistent starter in Serie A, reinforcing the overall picture of a player performing around or below the positional baseline across available metrics.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →