TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Jhon Lucumí

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
Bologna
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Jun 26, 1998 (27)
Jersey Number
#26
League
Serie A
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Jhon Lucumí
Jhon Lucumí
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
Bologna
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Jun 26, 1998 (27)
Jersey Number
#26
TactiQ Score
72.0
88% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
72.0
Form Score
67.8
Confidence
88%
Role
center_back
League
Serie A
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.26
Tackles
1.67
Rating
6.85
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A Serie A center back sitting at 51.13 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer band — with 26 appearances and 2,017 minutes this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what is absent: all role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score is built on limited dimensional signal. What data exists points to a player operating around the baseline for their position, not above it.

Why this score

The FQ score of 51.13 is driven primarily by below-baseline output on available metrics — a rating of 6.83 per 90 and 1.65 tackles per 90 are modest for a Serie A center back — compounded by the absence of a defenseScore, which is the primary evaluative dimension for this role. The performance agent scored this player at 45, reflecting that the core defensive picture cannot be fully constructed from the data available.

Form Trajectory

Form is stable: the form score of 49.9 sits just 1.2 points below the FQ score of 51.13, well within the ±5 threshold. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend — this player is performing consistently with their established baseline, for better or worse.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Kevin Diks

Diks scores 50.48 — nearly identical to this player's 51.13 — reflecting a similar profile of adequate but unspectacular defensive contribution; the key difference is Diks operates as a fullback, meaning his comparable score comes from a wider, more attack-involved role.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
28
Minutes
2197
Goals
1
Key passes
7
Rating
6.84
Tackles
41
Shots on target
2
Successful dribbles
5
Clean sheets
9
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 71.4Form 71.7
Previous
TQ 67.8Form 68.0
Current
TQ 67.2Form 67.8
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.04
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.26
Tackles
1.67
Rating
6.85
Adam Dźwigała

Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score mirrors the same typical-performer band, and like this player is a center back; the profiles are closely matched in overall output with neither distinguishing themselves above the positional baseline.

Compare →
Sead Kolašinac

Kolašinac at 50.04 rounds out a tight cluster of comparable scores; he brings more physicality and aerial presence as a known quantity, which may represent the ceiling this player has yet to demonstrate given the missing sub-score data.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2197 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
41 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Defensive outcomes
9 clean sheets are surfacing in the current live snapshot.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output

1.65 tackles per 90 is the only available defensive proxy, and no defenseScore, duel, interception, or clearance sub-score exists to assess core center back contributions. For a player whose entire value proposition is defensive, this is a meaningful analytical gap — and what signal exists does not suggest above-baseline output.

Ball progression / creation

0.27 key passes per 90 and a null progression sub-score indicate minimal contribution in the build-up phase. While creation is not a primary expectation for a center back, progressive passing and carrying are increasingly valued at this level, and there is no evidence of that here.

Match rating

A per-90 rating of 6.83 sits below what would be expected of a consistent starter in Serie A, reinforcing the overall picture of a player performing around or below the positional baseline across available metrics.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →