Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level center back in La Liga with an FQ Score of 48.93, placing them in the bottom half of all scored players — below the threshold of a reliable starter. The most distinctive feature of this profile is the near-total absence of granular sub-score data: all role-critical defensive dimensions (defense, physical duels, progression) return null, meaning the 48.93 reflects a limited signal picture rather than confirmed quality. Across 24 matches and 1,945 minutes, the available output is thin — 1.99 tackles per 90 and a 6.68 average rating are the primary observable markers.
The FQ Score of 48.93 is driven primarily by the absence of positive evidence rather than confirmed weakness: all defensive sub-scores are null, stripping out the metrics that define center back value. What remains — a 6.68 match rating and 1.99 tackles per 90 — does not generate enough signal to push the score above the fringe threshold.
With a form score of 52.01 against an FQ Score of 48.93, the delta is +3.1 — within the ±5 stable band, indicating no meaningful directional shift. Recent form is marginally above the multi-season baseline but not enough to signal a genuine upward trend.
Nearly identical FQ Score (48.49 vs 48.93) places both players in the same fringe-starter tier; Cabrera Sasía provides a direct peer benchmark at this score level.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
A close FQ Score match at 49.62, suggesting similar overall output levels; Alderete Fernández edges slightly higher, potentially reflecting marginally better data coverage or defensive contribution.
The highest-scoring comparable at 50.04, sitting just above the fringe threshold; Kolašinac's profile represents the ceiling of this peer group and the gap to adequate-starter territory.
All core defensive sub-scores — defense, physical duels, aerial, interceptions — are null. For a center back, these are the primary production metrics. Their absence means the player's most important contributions cannot be quantified, and the 1.99 tackles per 90 is the only defensive proxy available.
Key passes sit at just 0.23 per 90, and goals and assists return null. While low attacking output is expected for a center back, the combination of no creation data and no progression sub-score leaves the ball-playing dimension entirely unassessed.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →