Nikola Milenković
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.
A center back operating in the Premier League with an FQ Score of 50.49, placing them in the typical-performer band — adequate at best, with no standout dimension to separate them from the baseline. Across 34 matches and 3,060 minutes this season, the most visible on-ball contribution is a key pass rate of just 0.03 per 90, and a match rating of 6.75 reflects a player doing little to influence games beyond the minimum. All positional sub-scores are null, meaning the picture is built on aggregate signal rather than granular defensive or physical data.
With all sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression, etc.) returning null, the FQ Score of 50.49 is driven entirely by top-level aggregate metrics — a 6.75 average rating and 0.88 tackles per 90 — which together paint a picture of a center back meeting the bare minimum of positional output but not exceeding it in any measurable way. The absence of granular defensive data limits precision, but the high confidence score (0.92) means this aggregate read is reliable.
Form score of 46.73 sits 3.8 points below the FQ Score of 50.49 — within the ±5 stable band, but trending softly downward. This is not a temporary dip; the risk/form agent notes the decline is consistent with the player's sustained performance level rather than a short-term blip.
Nearly identical FQ Score (50.48 vs 50.49) places them at the same overall performance level; Diks operates as a fullback rather than a pure center back, giving him a different positional profile despite the matching aggregate output.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.