Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A La Liga center-back sitting at 52.16 on the FQ scale — squarely in the typical performer range (50-59) after 2,410 minutes across 28 matches this season. The most distinctive feature of this profile is what is absent: all role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, possession control, physical duel) are null, meaning the evaluation rests on surface-level output rather than a full positional breakdown. At 0.04 goals and 1.42 tackles per 90, the visible production numbers do not suggest a standout contributor at this level.
The FQ score of 52.16 reflects a mid-range performer with no sub-score dimension pulling the rating meaningfully upward. The absence of a defenseScore is the single biggest structural gap — for a center-back, defensive output is the primary value driver, and without it the score cannot be anchored to core role production.
Form score of 52.99 sits just 0.83 points above the FQ score of 52.16 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum; this player is performing at a consistent, flat level with no trajectory signal in either direction.
Both sit in the 52-53 FQ range for center-backs, reflecting similar overall output levels; Romero's profile is drawn from a comparable data context, though sub-score breakdowns may differ.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Comparable FQ score of 50.48 places Diks in the same typical-performer band; the key difference is positional versatility — Diks operates across defensive and wide roles, whereas this player is a dedicated center-back.
Dźwigała's 50.11 FQ score reflects a similarly mid-range center-back profile; both players share the absence of elite sub-score markers that would separate them from the baseline for their role.
The defenseScore sub-score is null despite 2,410 minutes played at center-back — the role's primary evaluation dimension. Tackles sit at 1.42 per 90, but without interceptions, aerial duel success, or duel win rate, a complete defensive picture cannot be formed. This data gap is a meaningful limitation for this role specifically.
0.04 goals per 90 and 0.49 key passes per 90 are minimal figures for any position, though low attacking output is expected for a center-back. The key pass rate is not negligible but does not indicate a ball-playing center-back profile either.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →