Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

A fringe-level center back in the Premier League with an FQ Score of 49.86 — sitting in the typical performer band and below the baseline expected of a consistent starter at this level. The most distinctive feature of this evaluation is what is missing: all role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score is built without direct measurement of the core contributions a center back is judged on. What data exists — 1.45 tackles per 90 and a 6.98 average rating across 27 matches — paints a picture of a player operating at the margins of adequacy.
The FQ Score of 49.86 is driven primarily by the absence of measurable defensive output — the defenseScore sub-score is null, which for a center back is the single most critical dimension. With no sub-score signal on duels, interceptions, or defensive actions, the score reflects a low baseline across available metrics rather than any identifiable strength pulling it upward.
Form is essentially stable — the form score of 51.04 sits just 1.18 points above the FQ Score of 49.86, well within the ±5 range that defines a flat trajectory. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum to act on.
Comparable FQ Score (50.04 vs 49.86) places them at the same fringe-starter tier; Kolašinac's profile, however, typically carries more physical duel data given his aggressive style, offering greater sub-score visibility.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Near-identical FQ Score (49.62) reflects a similar below-baseline defensive profile; Alderete's experience across multiple leagues provides a broader contextual baseline for comparison.
Marginally higher FQ Score (50.11) in the same performance band; the key difference is competitive context — league environment will significantly affect how both scores translate to actual quality.
The defenseScore sub-score is null despite 2,178 minutes played and 91% data completeness. For a center back, this is the primary production dimension — its absence means the player's core role contribution cannot be directly assessed, which is itself a meaningful signal about the quality of defensive actions being recorded.
0.12 goals per 90 and 0.12 key passes per 90 are negligible even by center back standards, offering no compensating value in build-up or set-piece threat that might offset the low overall score.
A 6.98 average rating across 27 Premier League appearances sits below the threshold of consistent reliability for a top-flight starter, reinforcing the below-baseline FQ Score rather than contradicting it.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →