TactiQ
Sign InGet Started
TactiQ
Football Intelligence
Founding Beta

TactiQ is built around Player & Club Data, Match Intelligence, Predictive Modeling, and Research & Visualization — understand the system, not the surface.

Core
Club football as the permanent base
Launch
World Cup as the launch amplifier
Transparency
Public roadmap and visible system progress
The standard
Methodology →

Every score is deterministic, evidence-gated, and confidence-labelled. Football intelligence should be explainable — not a black box with a number on the front. The methodology is part of the product, not a legal page.

Deterministic scoringMulti-agent consensus gatedPublication gate active
Core
PlayersClubsMatchesWorld Cup 2026Roadmap
Product
CompareRankingsForecastMethodologyMembership
Legal
PrivacyTerms© 2026 TactiQ. All rights reserved.
Player Profile

Loading player profile...

Pulling current player details into TactiQ.

Player Profile

Konstantinos Mavropanos

TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

Current Team
West Ham United
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 11, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#15
League
Premier League
Back to PlayersCompare PlayerOpen RankingsView Methodology
Konstantinos Mavropanos
Konstantinos Mavropanos
Current profile snapshot
Current Team
West Ham United
Position
Centre Back
Date of Birth
Dec 11, 1997 (28)
Jersey Number
#15
TactiQ Score
74.6
90% confidence
TactiQ Score v2
74.6
Form Score
72.1
Confidence
90%
Role
center_back
League
Premier League
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.12
Assists
—
Key Pass
0.12
Tackles
1.39
Rating
6.95
Multi-season trend
AI Analysis
Generated May 6, 2026

A fringe-level center back in the Premier League with an FQ Score of 49.86 — sitting in the typical performer band and below the baseline expected of a consistent starter at this level. The most distinctive feature of this evaluation is what is missing: all role-specific sub-scores (defense, physical duel, progression) are null, meaning the score is built without direct measurement of the core contributions a center back is judged on. What data exists — 1.45 tackles per 90 and a 6.98 average rating across 27 matches — paints a picture of a player operating at the margins of adequacy.

Why this score

The FQ Score of 49.86 is driven primarily by the absence of measurable defensive output — the defenseScore sub-score is null, which for a center back is the single most critical dimension. With no sub-score signal on duels, interceptions, or defensive actions, the score reflects a low baseline across available metrics rather than any identifiable strength pulling it upward.

Form Trajectory

Form is essentially stable — the form score of 51.04 sits just 1.18 points above the FQ Score of 49.86, well within the ±5 range that defines a flat trajectory. There is no meaningful upward or downward momentum to act on.

Similar Profiles
Players with comparable scoring profiles in the same role
Sead Kolašinac

Comparable FQ Score (50.04 vs 49.86) places them at the same fringe-starter tier; Kolašinac's profile, however, typically carries more physical duel data given his aggressive style, offering greater sub-score visibility.

Compare →
Rankings
See where this player sits across all scored players.

Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.

Open Rankings →
Compare
Put this player next to another and find the real edges.

TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.

Compare Player →
Methodology
Understand exactly how this score was built.

Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.

View Methodology →
Latest available season snapshot

Live statistics currently available for this profile

9 metrics surfaced
Appearances
29
Minutes
2358
Goals
3
Key passes
4
Rating
6.99
Tackles
36
Shots on target
8
Successful dribbles
2
Clean sheets
6
Current indicators
What the live season sample is surfacing right now
2 Seasons Ago
TQ 66.3Form 68.9
Previous
TQ 71.1Form 71.6
Current
TQ 71.5Form 72.1
Per 90 minutes
Goals
0.12
Assists
—
Key Passes
0.12
Tackles
1.39
Rating
6.95
Omar Federico Alderete Fernández

Near-identical FQ Score (49.62) reflects a similar below-baseline defensive profile; Alderete's experience across multiple leagues provides a broader contextual baseline for comparison.

Compare →
Adam Dźwigała

Marginally higher FQ Score (50.11) in the same performance band; the key difference is competitive context — league environment will significantly affect how both scores translate to actual quality.

Compare →
Heavy minute load
2358 minutes suggest a significant current role in the squad rotation.
Defensive activity
36 tackles indicate active intervention volume in the current season sample.
Strengths
Where this player is genuinely above baseline
No clearly elite traits identified in current data.
Watchpoints
Real gaps relative to this player's role
Defensive output visibility

The defenseScore sub-score is null despite 2,178 minutes played and 91% data completeness. For a center back, this is the primary production dimension — its absence means the player's core role contribution cannot be directly assessed, which is itself a meaningful signal about the quality of defensive actions being recorded.

Attacking contribution

0.12 goals per 90 and 0.12 key passes per 90 are negligible even by center back standards, offering no compensating value in build-up or set-piece threat that might offset the low overall score.

Match rating

A 6.98 average rating across 27 Premier League appearances sits below the threshold of consistent reliability for a top-flight starter, reinforcing the below-baseline FQ Score rather than contradicting it.

Reading the score

What each number means

TactiQ Score

A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.

Form Score

Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.

Confidence

How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.

Methodology

TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.

Read the full methodology →