Pulling current player details into TactiQ.
TactiQ Score, per-90 performance stats, and multi-season form — with direct routes into compare and rankings.

An adequate Ligue 1 fullback/wingback sitting at 64.05 on the FQ scale — squarely in the "adequate starter with clear gaps" band. The most distinctive signal here is attacking involvement: 2.25 key passes per 90 and 0.23 assists per 90 point to a player who contributes meaningfully in the final third for a defensive role. At 28 matches and 2,363 minutes, this is a well-established sample, not a small-game artifact.
With all role-specific sub-scores (defense, progression, creation, finishing) returning null, the FQ score of 64.05 is driven primarily by aggregate per-90 output rather than dimensional profiling. The 7.14 average match rating across 28 appearances reflects consistent, baseline-level contribution without a standout dimension pulling the score higher.
Form score of 65.46 sits just 1.41 points above the FQ score of 64.05 — well within the ±5 stable band. There is no meaningful upward or downward trend; this player is performing at their established level.
Both score in the 64–65 FQ range as attacking-minded fullbacks/wingbacks; Mittelstädt operates in a higher-profile league context which may account for his marginally higher 64.86 score.
Top 50 players by TactiQ Score — filter by position, form, and confidence.
TactiQ Score, form, confidence, and season stats compared side by side — instantly.
Every TactiQ Score is deterministic and traceable. Read the full methodology behind the numbers.
Raum's 63.21 FQ score reflects a near-identical output tier for the fullback/wingback role; the key difference is Raum's profile is built in a more defensively structured system, whereas this player's 2.25 key passes per 90 suggests a more open attacking environment.
Grimaldo's 67.56 FQ score represents the ceiling of this comparable group and illustrates the gap between adequate and above-average for the role; his higher score likely reflects stronger dimensional sub-score performance that this player's null sub-scores cannot currently match.
All defensive sub-scores are null, meaning defensive solidity — the primary expectation for a fullback/wingback — cannot be verified dimensionally. The 2.44 tackles per 90 is a positive raw indicator, but without a calibrated sub-score, defensive quality relative to role baseline remains unconfirmed.
Progression and creation sub-scores are both null, limiting assessment of whether the 2.25 key passes per 90 reflects genuine creative quality or high-volume, low-efficiency delivery. For a wingback role, this gap in dimensional data is a meaningful blind spot.
A 0–100 measure of overall quality. Combines statistical output with league difficulty, multi-season weighting, and a consistency factor. Target range for strong players: 70–85.
Weighted toward recent matches. Can diverge from the TactiQ Score when current form is meaningfully stronger or weaker than the multi-season average.
How much evidence supports this score. Lower confidence means thinner data — fewer seasons, fewer appearances, or gaps in coverage. A provisional score is real signal with appropriate caveats.
TactiQ Scores are deterministic — given the same evidence, they produce the same output. The evidence packet system, confidence labels, and publication gate are all explained in full.
Read the full methodology →